New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft GH-200 Exam - Topic 3 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's GH-200 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 3
[All GH-200 Questions]

Which of the following scenarios would require the use of self-hosted runners instead of GitHub-hosted runners?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

GitHub-hosted runners have a limit on the number of concurrent workflows (typically 20 for free-tier accounts and 5 for enterprise). If your organization needs to run more workflows simultaneously, you would need to use self-hosted runners to increase the available concurrency.

Self-hosted runners allow you to configure specialized hardware or software setups that are necessary for certain workflows. GitHub-hosted runners may not have access to custom hardware configurations like GPUs or other specialized resources, so self-hosted runners are required in such cases.


by Jolene at Nov 24, 2025, 04:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GH-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Eliseo
15 days ago
I think C) is also a reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
20 days ago
A) and B) for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
25 days ago
I'm with Tom on this one, gotta go with D for that sweet, sweet hardware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
1 month ago
D) all the way, can't beat that custom silicon!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
1 month ago
That's a tough one, I'd have to go with D. Specialized hardware is a dealbreaker for GitHub-hosted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
1 month ago
E) performing builds on macOS
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
2 months ago
C) using Docker containers as part of the workflow
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
2 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think exceeding the monthly minutes is a reason too, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 months ago
I feel like using Docker containers might also require self-hosted runners, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about GitHub-hosted runners having limits on concurrent workflows. Is that A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with the differences between the GitHub-hosted and self-hosted runners. I'll need to review the documentation to make sure I understand the specific limitations and capabilities of each. I don't want to guess and risk getting this wrong on the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
2 months ago
I've got this! The key is understanding the capabilities and limitations of the GitHub-hosted runners. Scenarios A, B, C, and D all describe situations where the GitHub-hosted runners wouldn't be sufficient, so self-hosted runners would be required. E is the only one that's a bit more ambiguous, but the others are pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
3 months ago
I think self-hosted runners are definitely needed when you have specialized hardware configurations, right? That sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
3 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The GitHub-hosted runners have limits on concurrent workflows and monthly build time, so A and B are clear cases for self-hosted. C and D also seem like they would require more customization that the GitHub-hosted runners may not provide. E is an interesting one, I'll have to double-check the supported platforms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
3 months ago
D) using specialized hardware configurations required for workflows
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
3 months ago
Wait, can you really exceed 50,000 minutes? That seems high!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the GitHub-hosted runners have some limitations, but I'm not sure I fully understand all the differences. I'll need to review the documentation on self-hosted runners to make sure I'm clear on when to use them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
4 months ago
I think the key here is to identify the limitations of the GitHub-hosted runners and when self-hosted runners would be a better option. Scenarios C and D seem like they would require more specialized configurations that the GitHub-hosted runners may not support.
upvoted 0 times
Martina
3 months ago
Yeah, GitHub-hosted runners have their limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel