What is a benefit of the Azure Cosmos DB Table API as compared to Azure Table storage?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium DP-900 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Multi-master support for Azure Cosmos DB is now available in all public regions.
Azure CosmosDB table API is a key-value storage hosted in the cloud. It's a part of Azure Cosmos DB, that is Microsoft's multi-model database.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/table-support
12 comments · newest first
DA
Dalene
12 months ago
Not sure about the resiliency claim, sounds too good to be true.
AR
Argelia
1 year ago
Multi-master model is a game changer for availability!
ED
Eden
1 year ago
Wait, does it really provide higher storage capacity?
VE
Veronika
1 year ago
Totally agree, partitioning makes scaling easier.
RO
Rosio
1 year ago
Supports partitioning is a big plus!
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
Higher storage capacity sounds familiar, but I thought both services had their limits. I need to double-check that detail.
OS
Osvaldo
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like partitioning is important for scalability, but I can't recall if it's exclusive to Cosmos DB.
WI
Willard
1 year ago
I remember something about resiliency in Cosmos DB, especially if a region fails. That might be a significant advantage.
JE
Jettie
1 year ago
I think the multi-master model is a key feature of Cosmos DB, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main benefit over Azure Table storage.
GL
Glenn
1 year ago
The industry the organization operates in is a good place to start. Different industries have different norms and expectations when it comes to compensation.
MI
Mitzie
1 year ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. The question says the agent "normally" uses that little, but what if there are times when it uses more? I might need to think about that a bit more before answering.
LE
Leatha
1 year ago
CHAP authentication comes to mind, but I'm not sure if it's specifically for L2TPv3. I feel like I need to double-check that.