Microsoft DP-420 Exam - Topic 8 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-420 exam

Question #: 17
Topic #: 8

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure Cosmos DB Core (SQL) API account named account 1 that uses autoscale throughput.

You need to run an Azure function when the normalized request units per second for a container in account1 exceeds a specific value.

Solution: You configure the function to have an Azure CosmosDB trigger.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

Instead configure an Azure Monitor alert to trigger the function.

You can set up alerts from the Azure Cosmos DB pane or the Azure Monitor service in the Azure portal.

by Kanisha at Jul 28, 2022, 12:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cyndy

4 months ago

Definitely meets the goal, triggers are designed for this!

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

4 months ago

Surprised this is even a question, thought it was a given!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

4 months ago

Azure CosmosDB triggers are cool, but does it really handle autoscale?

upvoted 0 times

...

Eleonora

4 months ago

I don't think that's right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

5 months ago

Yes, that would work!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

5 months ago

I think the trigger is meant for data changes, not for monitoring performance metrics like request units. So, I’m leaning towards "No" on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

5 months ago

I feel like the trigger could work, but I also recall that it might not directly relate to monitoring request units. It seems a bit off to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moira

5 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question where we had to set up alerts based on throughput. I think we might need a different method for this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alona

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure if using a CosmosDB trigger is the right approach for monitoring request units. I thought it was more about changes in the data rather than throughput.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

5 months ago

This looks like a straightforward question about the Predicate interface. I'm pretty confident I can handle this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizette

5 months ago

Hmm, let me take a closer look at the code. I think I can count the statements, but I want to double-check to make sure I don't miss anything.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

5 months ago

For IV, I recall that system test planning and project planning can indeed happen together in the V-model, so that one is probably true too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

5 months ago

I've got a good feeling about this one. I'd start by considering the user experience and how to make the FAQ as accessible and helpful as possible. Option D with trigger phrases sounds promising.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

5 months ago

I might be mixing things up, but aren't we supposed to check for active sessions? I feel like "show crypto ikev2 sa" could be the right command.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harrison

5 months ago

Okay, let me walk through this step-by-step. A digital signature is used to validate the sender, not the recipient. That rules out option A. The signature itself doesn't encrypt the message, so C is not correct. And the signature doesn't guarantee the message is virus-free, so D is also wrong. That leaves B as the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...