Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft DP-420 Exam - Topic 5 Question 25 Discussion

You need to create a data store for a directory of small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs). The data store must meet the following requirements:* Store companies and the users employed by them. Each company will have less than 1,000 users.* Some users have data that is greater than 2 KB.* Associate each user to only one company.* Provide the ability to browse by company.* Provide the ability to browse the users by company.* Whenever a company or user profile is selected, show a details page for the company and all the related users.* Be optimized for reading data.Which design should you implement to optimize the data store for reading data?
A) In a directory container, create a document for each company and a document for each user. Use company ID as the partition key.
B) In a company container, create a document for each company. Embed the users into company documents. Use the company ID as the partition key.
C) Create a user container that uses the user ID as the partition key and a company container that container that uses the company ID as the partition key. Add the company ID to each user documents.
D) In a user container, create a document for each user. Embed the company into each user document. Use the user ID as the partition key.

Microsoft DP-420 Exam - Topic 5 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-420 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 5
[All DP-420 Questions]

You need to create a data store for a directory of small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs). The data store must meet the following requirements:

* Store companies and the users employed by them. Each company will have less than 1,000 users.

* Some users have data that is greater than 2 KB.

* Associate each user to only one company.

* Provide the ability to browse by company.

* Provide the ability to browse the users by company.

* Whenever a company or user profile is selected, show a details page for the company and all the related users.

* Be optimized for reading data.

Which design should you implement to optimize the data store for reading data?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Louisa at Sep 02, 2023, 01:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Aleta
10 months ago
Totally with B! It’s optimized for reading, makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
10 months ago
Wait, embedding users? Isn’t that risky if user data grows?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
10 months ago
C could work, but it feels a bit complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
10 months ago
I think A is better for scalability, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
11 months ago
Option B seems solid, embedding users keeps everything together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
11 months ago
I recall that embedding can help with performance, but I’m not certain if the user data being over 2 KB affects that decision in option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether to use separate containers or embed data. I feel like option A might complicate things with too many documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
11 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar from our practice questions, where we talked about reducing the number of queries needed to fetch users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of optimizing for read operations, but I'm not sure if embedding users in company documents is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
11 months ago
This is a tough one. I'm not sure which option is best. I might need to draw out some diagrams to visualize the different approaches and how they'd work. Gotta make sure I fully understand the requirements before jumping into an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the partition key part. Should I use the company ID or the user ID? I'll need to think through the tradeoffs of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
11 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward data modeling question. I'd start by thinking through the requirements and how to best structure the data to optimize for reading. The key seems to be associating users with their companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy. Since the question says to optimize for reading, I'd go with option B and embed the users into the company documents. That way I can quickly retrieve all the users for a given company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
11 months ago
I think the answer is A. The auditee would want to assess the key auditor skills like interviewing, interaction, and the accuracy of the final report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky configuration question. I'll need to carefully examine the exhibit and options to determine the correct setup for 12 time slots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards the shop order master file too. I think we practiced a question like this last week!
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
1 year ago
Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser! I'm kind of torn between options B and C. I guess it really depends on the specifics of the data and how you expect the application to be used. If you're mostly just browsing by company, then B might be the way to go. But if you need more flexibility in querying, C could be the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
Mickie
1 year ago
Definitely. It's all about optimizing for the most common use cases while still allowing for future growth and changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
1 year ago
I see your point. It's important to consider how the data will be accessed and what kind of queries will be common.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
1 year ago
That's true, but C might offer more flexibility in the long run. It really depends on the specific needs of the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
1 year ago
I agree, it's a tough decision. I think B could be simpler if you mainly care about browsing by company.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sol
1 year ago
Option D seems like a good fit too. Embedding the company information into the user documents could make it easier to retrieve user details, and using the user ID as the partition key is a sensible choice. However, I'm not sure how well it would scale if the number of users per company starts to grow.
upvoted 0 times
Lajuana
1 year ago
True, scalability is a key factor to consider. Option A provides a good balance between optimizing data reading and scalability for the directory of SMBs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
1 year ago
I agree, Option A would definitely make it easier to browse by company. It's important to consider scalability when designing the data store.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
1 year ago
Option A seems like the best choice for optimizing data reading. Using the company ID as the partition key for both company and user documents would make it efficient to browse by company.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheridan
1 year ago
I'm not a big fan of embedding user data into the company documents. It might work for small companies, but for larger ones with hundreds of users, it could lead to bloated documents and performance issues. I think option C is a better approach, with separate containers for users and companies.
upvoted 0 times
Shonda
1 year ago
I see your point about option C, having separate containers would definitely make it easier to manage the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
1 year ago
I think option A could work too, as long as the companies and users are not too large.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
1 year ago
I agree with you, option C seems like the best choice for scalability and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
1 year ago
The requirements definitely call for a document-based data store, and option B seems the most suitable. Embedding the users into the company documents will allow for efficient browsing by company, and using the company ID as the partition key will optimize for reading.
upvoted 0 times
Narcisa
1 year ago
It makes sense to embed the users into the company documents for efficient browsing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 year ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
1 year ago
B) In a company container, create a document for each company. Embed the users into company documents. Use the company ID as the partition key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aracelis
1 year ago
I personally prefer option C because it keeps user and company data separate but still links them together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more efficient as it embeds users into company documents for easier browsing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice because it separates companies and users into different documents.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel