Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft DP-420 Exam - Topic 3 Question 27 Discussion

Your company develops an application named App1 that uses the Azure Cosmos DB SDK and the Eventual consistency level.App1 queries an Azure Cosmos DB for NoSQL account named account!You need to identify which consistency level to assign to App1 to meet the following requirements:* Maximize the throughput of the queries generated by App1 without increasing the number of request units currently used by the queries.* Provide the highest consistency guarantees.Which consistency level should you identify?
A) Strong
B) Bounded Staleness
C) Session
D) Consistent Prefix

Microsoft DP-420 Exam - Topic 3 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-420 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 3
[All DP-420 Questions]

Your company develops an application named App1 that uses the Azure Cosmos DB SDK and the Eventual consistency level.

App1 queries an Azure Cosmos DB for NoSQL account named account!

You need to identify which consistency level to assign to App1 to meet the following requirements:

* Maximize the throughput of the queries generated by App1 without increasing the number of request units currently used by the queries.

* Provide the highest consistency guarantees.

Which consistency level should you identify?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Claribel at Oct 22, 2023, 06:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Martha
10 months ago
Consistent Prefix seems too loose for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
10 months ago
Wait, can Bounded Staleness really provide high guarantees?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
10 months ago
Session consistency might be enough for most use cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
10 months ago
I think Strong consistency is the way to go for highest guarantees!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
10 months ago
Bounded Staleness is a good choice for balancing throughput and consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards Session consistency because it balances performance and guarantees, but I’m not sure if it’s the best fit for maximizing throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question about consistency levels, and I feel like Bounded Staleness could be a good option, but I'm not confident it meets both requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
11 months ago
I think Strong consistency might be the answer since it guarantees the highest level of consistency, but it could impact throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
11 months ago
I remember studying the different consistency levels, but I'm not entirely sure which one provides the highest guarantees while maximizing throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
11 months ago
This is a good one. I'll need to apply my knowledge of Azure Cosmos DB and the different consistency levels to identify the optimal solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read it carefully and make sure I understand the exact requirements before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to find the consistency level that meets both requirements - maximizing throughput without increasing request units, and providing the highest consistency guarantees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'll need to carefully weigh the requirements of maximizing throughput and providing the highest consistency guarantees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the Azure Cosmos DB consistency levels and their tradeoffs to determine the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
11 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The key is to identify whether the IE5000 is used in the access, aggregation, or distribution layer of the network hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Let me re-read the question and see if I can figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'm leaning towards Consistent Prefix, since it seems to strike a nice balance between consistency and performance. But it's a tough call, to be honest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
2 years ago
Nah, I'm pretty sure Strong consistency is the way to go. Sure, it might not be as fast, but if we really need the highest consistency guarantees, that's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
2 years ago
I disagree, I think Session consistency would be the better choice. It provides a good balance between consistency and throughput, and it's a good fit for our use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
2 years ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. We need to maximize throughput without increasing request units, but also provide the highest consistency guarantees. I'm thinking Bounded Staleness might be the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel