New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft DP-420 Exam - Topic 14 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-420 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 14
[All DP-420 Questions]

You need to implement a solution to meet the product catalog requirements.

What should you do to implement the conflict resolution policy.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Artie at Sep 17, 2024, 06:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Narcisa
3 months ago
Removing frequently changed fields (A) is definitely a best practice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
3 months ago
Migrating to a new container (D) could be a hassle but might be necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
4 months ago
Surprised that C is even an option, eventual consistency might not be reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
4 months ago
I disagree, disabling indexing on all fields (B) could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
4 months ago
Option A seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
4 months ago
Creating a new container seems like a drastic step, but it might be necessary if the current setup is too problematic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
5 months ago
Setting the default consistency level to eventual sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it directly relates to conflict resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
5 months ago
I think disabling indexing on all fields might lead to performance issues, but it could help with conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
5 months ago
I remember we discussed conflict resolution policies in class, but I'm not sure if removing frequently changed fields is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
5 months ago
Ah, I see. Removing the frequently changed field from the index policy seems like it could be a good way to reduce conflicts. I'll make a note of that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
5 months ago
Okay, I think I have an idea. Disabling indexing on all fields in the index policy of the con-product container could help resolve conflicts by not relying on the index. I'll mark that as my answer for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I'm not sure which of these options would be the best approach to implementing the conflict resolution policy. I'll need to review the concepts around indexing and consistency levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the conflict resolution policy requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a good handle on the key AI/ML benefits of running on ACK. I think I can confidently select the 4 correct options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
10 months ago
Somebody's going to be working overtime to get this migration done. At least it's not my problem!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
10 months ago
Ha! I bet the product team is really wishing they had planned this out better. Migrating to a new container is probably the cleanest solution.
upvoted 0 times
Vicki
9 months ago
D) Create a new container and migrate the product catalog data to the new container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
9 months ago
C) Set the default consistency level for account1 to eventual.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
9 months ago
B) Disable indexing on all fields in the index policy of the con-product container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
9 months ago
A) Remove frequently changed field from the index policy of the con-product container.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Curtis
10 months ago
Choosing option C and setting the consistency level to eventual could work, but that might not be ideal for a product catalog where you need strong consistency.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
9 months ago
C) Set the default consistency level for account1 to eventual.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
9 months ago
B) Disable indexing on all fields in the index policy of the con-product container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
9 months ago
A) Remove frequently changed field from the index policy of the con-product container.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
10 months ago
I was thinking option A, but removing frequently changed fields from the index policy might not be a good long-term solution. Disabling indexing entirely (option B) seems too extreme.
upvoted 0 times
Ivan
9 months ago
What about option D? Creating a new container could be a better long-term solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
9 months ago
I agree, but option B might cause other issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
10 months ago
I think option A is a good short-term solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eric
11 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice here. Migrating the data to a new container allows you to start fresh with the index policy and conflict resolution.
upvoted 0 times
Zena
9 months ago
D) Create a new container and migrate the product catalog data to the new container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
10 months ago
C) Set the default consistency level for account1 to eventual.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
10 months ago
B) Disable indexing on all fields in the index policy of the con-product container.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deeanna
11 months ago
I agree with Art, disabling indexing on all fields seems like the best solution to meet the product catalog requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should create a new container and migrate the product catalog data to the new container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
11 months ago
I think we should disable indexing on all fields in the index policy of the con-product container.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel