New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft DP-300 Exam - Topic 12 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-300 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 12
[All DP-300 Questions]

You have an Azure SQL database named DB1.

You have a table name Table1 that has 20 columns of type CHAR(400). Row compression for Table1 is enabled.

During a database audit, you discover that none of the fields contain more than 150 characters.

You need to ensure that you can apply page compression to Table1.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

by Lenny at Jun 29, 2024, 01:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Stefan
3 months ago
Sparse columns? Really? I thought that was for different use cases!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
3 months ago
Changing to varchar (200) could work too, but not sure if it's the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
3 months ago
Wait, why not just use nvarchar? Seems like a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
4 months ago
I agree, varchar (MAX) is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
4 months ago
You need to change the column type to varchar for page compression.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
4 months ago
I feel like nvarchar(MAX) is not the right choice here since we only need to store up to 150 characters. It seems like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to optimize storage. I think changing to varchar(200) could be a good option since it limits the size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think sparse columns are more about saving space for NULL values. Not sure if that helps with page compression.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
5 months ago
I remember reading that page compression requires the data types to be variable-length, so I think changing to varchar might be the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. Changing the column type should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
5 months ago
Page compression, huh? I'm a bit unsure about the specifics, but I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
5 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer here. Let me double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
5 months ago
This looks like a classic network access control issue. I think the key is to identify the problem - clients are getting the correct IP address but can't access the internet, so it's likely an ACL or firewall rule blocking the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Regulation T is not my strongest area, so I'll need to review the key points before making a decision. Hopefully, I can eliminate a few options and narrow it down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
10 months ago
I'm no database expert, but I'm pretty sure option A, configuring the columns as sparse, is a completely different feature. Someone's trying to trick us here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
10 months ago
Hold up, why are we even using CHAR in the first place? Shouldn't we be using VARCHAR to begin with? I'd go with option C and change it to varchar (MAX).
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
10 months ago
Woah, 400 characters for a CHAR field? That's overkill! I'd go with option D and change it to varchar (200). Less memory usage, and it still covers the 150 character limit.
upvoted 0 times
Son
8 months ago
Agreed, it's a more efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
8 months ago
Good point! That would definitely save on memory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
9 months ago
Option D) Change the column type to varchar (200).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sophia
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm thinking option B. Changing the column type to nvarchar (MAX) seems like the way to go. That'll allow for the page compression to work its magic.
upvoted 0 times
Amie
10 months ago
I think option D might be better, changing the column type to varchar (200) could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
10 months ago
I agree with you, option B seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorita
11 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe we should consider configuring the columns as sparse instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
11 months ago
I agree with Chantell, changing the column type to varchar (200) seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
11 months ago
I think we should change the column type to varchar (200) to apply page compression.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel