Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-801 Exam - Topic 5 Question 77 Discussion

You have two servers named Server1 and Server2 that run Windows Server. Both servers have the Hyper-V server role installed.Server1 hosts three virtual machines named VM1, VM2, and VM3. The virtual machines replicate to Server2.Server1 experiences a hardware failure.You need to bring VM1, VM2, and VM3 back online as soon as possible.From the Hyper-V Manager console on Server2, what should you run for each virtual machine?
C) Unplanned Failover
A) Start
B) Move
D) Planned Failover

Microsoft AZ-801 Exam - Topic 5 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-801 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 5
[All AZ-801 Questions]

You have two servers named Server1 and Server2 that run Windows Server. Both servers have the Hyper-V server role installed.

Server1 hosts three virtual machines named VM1, VM2, and VM3. The virtual machines replicate to Server2.

Server1 experiences a hardware failure.

You need to bring VM1, VM2, and VM3 back online as soon as possible.

From the Hyper-V Manager console on Server2, what should you run for each virtual machine?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/virtualization/hyper-v/manage/set-up-hyper-v-replica

by Maryann at May 04, 2025, 01:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-801 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Thomasena
7 months ago
Unplanned Failover is definitely the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
7 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that? What if there's data loss?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
8 months ago
Just start them up, right? Seems easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
8 months ago
Totally agree, that's the right move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
8 months ago
You need to run Unplanned Failover for those VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused; could we use Planned Failover instead? But I guess that wouldn’t apply here since it was unplanned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
8 months ago
I feel like this is similar to a practice question I did, and it was definitely about unplanned failover. I think that's the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about starting the VMs after a failover. Maybe we should just start them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
9 months ago
I think we need to use the Unplanned Failover option since Server1 had a hardware failure. That sounds right based on what I practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
9 months ago
I'm confident that the correct answer is "Unplanned Failover". This option will allow us to quickly bring the VMs back online on the secondary server without any additional configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
9 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. Since Server1 experienced a hardware failure, we'll need to perform an unplanned failover to bring the VMs back online on Server2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Hyper-V has failover capabilities, but I'm not sure which option is the best in this specific situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
10 months ago
This looks like a straightforward Hyper-V failover scenario. I think the key is to identify the appropriate action to bring the VMs back online quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 year ago
You're right, Unplanned Failover would be quicker. Let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
1 year ago
But wouldn't Unplanned Failover be faster in this situation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
1 year ago
I'm just glad I don't have to deal with this kind of server drama in my daily life. Although, a little unplanned failover might liven up my boring desk job, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Bettyann
1 year ago
A) Start
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 year ago
A) Start
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyce
1 year ago
I think we should run Planned Failover for each virtual machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 year ago
C'mon, guys, this is a no-brainer! Unplanned Failover is the way to go. Who needs planning when you've got a good old-fashioned server meltdown, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Nickole
1 year ago
User3: Unplanned Failover
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
1 year ago
User2: Unplanned Failover
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
1 year ago
User1: Start
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgiann
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Wouldn't a Planned Failover be better in this case? It might take a bit longer, but it seems like the more reliable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
1 year ago
We need to bring VM1, VM2, and VM3 back online quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C) Unplanned Failover. If Server1 had a hardware failure, we need to bring the virtual machines back online quickly, and Unplanned Failover seems like the best option to do that.
upvoted 0 times
Lawanda
1 year ago
D) Planned Failover
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 year ago
C) Unplanned Failover
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
1 year ago
B) Move
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
1 year ago
A) Start
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel