Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-801 Exam - Topic 4 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-801 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-801 Questions]

You have 10 servers that run Windows Server in a workgroup.

You need to configure the servers to encrypt all the network traffic between the servers. The solution must be as secure as possible.

Which authentication method should you configure in a connection security rule?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Delila at Aug 06, 2024, 11:34 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-801 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Trinidad
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure computer certificates are the best option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
6 months ago
Pre-shared key sounds too simple for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
6 months ago
NTLMv2? Really? That seems outdated for encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
6 months ago
Definitely agree, KerberosV5 is also a solid choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
6 months ago
I think computer certificate is the way to go for max security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
6 months ago
I believe KerberosV5 is the standard for secure authentication in Windows environments, but I wonder if it can be used in a workgroup setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the pre-shared key option. It seems less secure than the others, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like using a computer certificate would provide the strongest security for encrypting traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
7 months ago
I think I remember that NTLMv2 is less secure than Kerberos, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
7 months ago
Pre-shared key could work, but it might be a bit less secure than some of the other options. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
7 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking for the most secure authentication method, so I'm thinking Kerberos V5 or computer certificate might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
7 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the security requirements here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
7 months ago
NTLMv2 is a good option, but I'm not sure if it's the most secure choice for this scenario. I'll have to review the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
7 months ago
Okay, I've got this. A LAN switch without IGMP snooping would forward a multicast frame as if it were a unicast frame with an unknown destination, so the answer is B. I'm confident in this because I remember learning about this specific behavior in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
7 months ago
This is right up my alley! As the management accountant, I can definitely contribute to the company's sustainability mission. Options A, D, and E are the clear winners here - they directly address environmental and social impacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
1 year ago
Kerberos? More like Kerberos the Great, amirite? Securing those servers is serious business, but at least we can have a little fun with the terminology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 year ago
NTLMv2? Really? That's like bringing a knife to a gun fight. Kerberos is the clear winner here, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Cathrine
11 months ago
Let's go with KerberosV5 for the connection security rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
11 months ago
I agree, Kerberos is much more secure than NTLMv2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
11 months ago
KerberosV5 is definitely the way to go for encrypting network traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lucia
1 year ago
Computer certificate seems like a good option too, but Kerberos is probably the way to go if we want the 'most secure possible' solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 year ago
Hmm, I was thinking of using pre-shared key, but I guess Kerberos is the way to go for maximum security. Can't be too careful with those server communications, right?
upvoted 0 times
Tawna
11 months ago
Using a computer certificate would also be a good choice for securing the network traffic between the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
11 months ago
NTLMv2 is not as secure as KerberosV5, so it's best to go with the latter for maximum security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
12 months ago
I agree, KerberosV5 is definitely the most secure option for encrypting network traffic between servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
1 year ago
KerberosV5 is the most secure option here, as it provides strong mutual authentication and encryption for the network traffic between the servers.
upvoted 0 times
Roy
11 months ago
Computer certificates can also be secure, but KerberosV5 is generally considered more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
11 months ago
What about using computer certificates for authentication?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
12 months ago
I agree, KerberosV5 provides strong mutual authentication and encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
12 months ago
I think KerberosV5 is the best option for securing the network traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 year ago
I agree, KerberosV5 provides strong authentication and encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
1 year ago
I think KerberosV5 is the best option for securing the network traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timmy
1 year ago
I'm not sure about computer certificates. Wouldn't KerberosV5 be a better choice for authentication in this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
1 year ago
I agree with Chandra. Using computer certificates for authentication is the most secure option for encrypting network traffic between the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
1 year ago
I think we should go with option D) computer certificate. It provides the highest level of security for encrypting network traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel