Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-801 Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-801 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 2
[All AZ-801 Questions]

You have a server that runs Windows Server. The server is configured to encrypt all incoming traffic by using a connection security rule.

You need to ensure that Server1 can respond to the unencrypted tracert commands initiated from computers on the same network.

What should you do from Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Cyril at Jun 12, 2025, 01:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-801 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Svetlana
18 days ago
You know, I once tried to tracert a server that was behind a military-grade encryption firewall. Let's just say the results were... explosive. Option D is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Garry
6 hours ago
I agree, option D is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gertude
26 days ago
Turning off the firewall? What is this, amateur hour? Option B is the way to go. We need to specifically allow the ICMP traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
27 days ago
I think Option D is the correct answer. IPsec exemptions should let the tracert commands through while keeping the rest of the traffic encrypted.
upvoted 0 times
Lenna
2 days ago
Let's go with Option D then, it seems like the best choice to allow the tracert commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
9 days ago
I agree, IPsec exemptions should work to allow the unencrypted tracert commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
16 days ago
Option D is correct. IPsec exemptions will allow the tracert commands through.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bethanie
2 months ago
Haha, turning off the firewall? Yeah, right, that's not the solution we're looking for here. Option D seems more promising.
upvoted 0 times
Rodolfo
16 days ago
User2: Yeah, Option D to configure IPsec exemptions sounds like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
17 days ago
User1: I agree, turning off the firewall is not the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keith
2 months ago
But wouldn't configuring IPsec exemptions from the IPsec Settings also achieve the same result?
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
I agree with Kimbery. Allowing ICMPv4 protocol connections would enable Server1 to respond to unencrypted tracert commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 months ago
Option B sounds like the way to go. We need to allow unencrypted traffic for tracert, and creating a custom outbound rule for ICMPv4 should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Britt
20 days ago
Great, let's go ahead and configure that custom outbound rule in Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
24 days ago
That makes sense. By allowing ICMPv4 protocol connections, Server1 will be able to respond to unencrypted tracert commands initiated from computers on the same network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
26 days ago
I agree, creating a new custom outbound rule that allows ICMPv4 protocol connections for all profiles seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
1 months ago
Option B sounds like the way to go. We need to allow unencrypted traffic for tracert, and creating a custom outbound rule for ICMPv4 should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
I think we should create a new custom outbound rule that allows ICMPv4 protocol connections for all profiles.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel