Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 4 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam

Question #: 66
Topic #: 4

You have an on-premises DNS server named Server1 that hosts a primary DNS zone named fabrikam.com.

You have an Azure subscription that contains the resources shown in the following table.

Users on the on-premises network access resources on all the virtual networks by using a Site-to-Site (S2S) VPN. You need to deploy an Azure DNS Private Resolver solution that meets the following requirements:

* Resources connected to the virtual networks must be able to resolve DNS names for fabrikam.com.

* Server1 must be able to resolve the DNS names of the resources in contoso.com.

* The solution must minimize costs and administrative effort.

What is the minimum number of resolvers you should deploy?

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Rolland at Aug 06, 2024, 10:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Raina

10 months ago

I’m leaning towards 1 as well, seems cost-effective!

upvoted 0 times

...

Janna

10 months ago

2 might be safer for redundancy, just in case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reed

10 months ago

Wait, are we sure about that? What if traffic increases?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alayna

10 months ago

Totally agree, 1 should cover it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jarvis

10 months ago

I think you only need 1 resolver for this setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wava

11 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the requirements. Does anyone remember if we need separate resolvers for each domain or if one can handle both?

upvoted 0 times

...

Man

11 months ago

If I recall correctly, we need at least two resolvers to handle the DNS resolution for both fabrikam.com and contoso.com.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorathy

11 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to minimize costs. I feel like one resolver might be enough, but I could be wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Craig

11 months ago

I remember we discussed the Azure DNS Private Resolver in class, but I'm not sure about the exact number of resolvers needed for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hortencia

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure about this one. The requirements mention resources connected to the virtual networks, but don't specify how many virtual networks there are. I'll need to carefully analyze the network diagram to determine the minimum number of resolvers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonida

11 months ago

This seems straightforward. Since the question states we need to "minimize costs and administrative effort," the answer is clearly 2 resolvers - one for each domain. Any more than that would be overkill.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

11 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that Server1 needs to resolve DNS names for contoso.com, and the Azure resources need to resolve DNS names for fabrikam.com. So we'll need at least two resolvers to handle the two different domains.

upvoted 0 times

...

Toshia

11 months ago

This looks like a tricky Azure DNS Private Resolver question. I'll need to carefully review the requirements and network topology to determine the minimum number of resolvers needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alex

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different virtual networks and how the on-premises DNS server Server1 needs to interact with the Azure resources. I'll need to think through the connectivity requirements step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawana

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between the 'Admin' and 'System' pages. I'll need to review that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

12 months ago

This one seems pretty straightforward. The question is asking about the project management process group where the performance quality audit activity is done, and the answer choices list the different process groups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

1 year ago

Hah, 4 resolvers? That's like having a whole army of DNS resolvers, just to handle a few virtual networks. I think 2 or 3 would be the sweet spot here, but I'm curious to see what the correct answer is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Macy

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards 3 resolvers. That way we can have one for each domain, plus an extra one to handle the VPN connections and minimize costs. Although, I do wonder if a fourth resolver would be overkill in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

Moon

1 year ago

I believe 3 resolvers should be enough to meet the requirements and minimize costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abel

1 year ago

I agree, having one resolver for each domain and an extra one for VPN connections sounds like a good plan.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arleen

1 year ago

I think 3 resolvers would be the best option to cover all the domains and VPN connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

1 year ago

Alright, let's think this through. We need to connect Server1 to contoso.com and the other virtual networks to fabrikam.com. Sounds like we might need at least two resolvers to handle that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

1 year ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm wondering if deploying just one resolver would be enough to meet all the requirements, or if we'd need more to handle the cross-domain resolution needs.

upvoted 0 times