Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 4 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 4

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have two Azure virtual networks named Vnet1 and Vnet2.

You have a Windows 10 device named Client1 that connects to Vnet1 by using a Point-to-Site (P2S) IKEv2 VPN.

You implement virtual network peering between Vnet1 and Vnet2. Vnet1 allows gateway transit. Vnet2 can use the remote gateway.

You discover that Client1 cannot communicate with Vnet2.

You need to ensure that Client1 can communicate with Vnet2.

Solution: You enable BGP on the gateway of Vnet1.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Tyra at Apr 25, 2023, 04:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Carma

4 months ago

Just enabling BGP won't fix Client1's access to Vnet2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kendra

4 months ago

No way, this won't solve the communication issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantell

4 months ago

Wait, I thought BGP was for routing between networks?

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbie

4 months ago

Totally agree, enabling BGP won't help here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rochell

4 months ago

BGP isn't necessary for P2S connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jani

5 months ago

I feel like the issue might be related to the VPN configuration rather than BGP. I need to double-check the requirements for P2S connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brock

5 months ago

From what I practiced, I believe enabling BGP might not directly solve the communication problem since it's more about routing updates, not connectivity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

5 months ago

I think I came across a similar question where enabling BGP was mentioned, but I can't recall if it was the right solution for communication issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolland

5 months ago

I remember studying BGP and its role in routing, but I'm not sure if enabling it on Vnet1 will actually help Client1 reach Vnet2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leeann

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward configuration issue. I'll carefully review the options and think through where the voicemail pilot number should be set.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ezekiel

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the devfsadm command. I'll need to double-check the details on that before selecting an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reiko

9 months ago

The solution seems reasonable, but I can't help but wonder if there's a more elegant way to achieve the goal. Maybe we could just call the Azure fairies and have them wave their magic wands?

upvoted 0 times

Arleen

8 months ago

User4: Calling the Azure fairies might be a bit of a stretch, but it's worth considering all possibilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zona

8 months ago

User3: Maybe we should explore other options before going with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynsey

9 months ago

User2: Yeah, that sounds like a solid solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sophia

9 months ago

User1: I think enabling BGP on the gateway of Vnet1 should do the trick.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

10 months ago

Ah, the age-old question of virtual network peering. If it doesn't work, just add more routing protocols! It's like playing Tetris with network configurations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathryn

10 months ago

Hold on, does this mean I'll have to configure BGP on my poor little Windows 10 device? That sounds like a lot of work! Can't we just use some kind of magic Azure button instead?

upvoted 0 times

...

Eve

10 months ago

I'm not sure that enabling BGP is the right solution here. Isn't there another way to enable connectivity between the virtual networks without modifying the VPN client's configuration?

upvoted 0 times

Brigette

8 months ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Howard

8 months ago

I think enabling BGP on the gateway of Vnet1 might be the right solution to ensure connectivity between the virtual networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shad

8 months ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

9 months ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

10 months ago

Enabling BGP on the Vnet1 gateway is a good solution. It allows for dynamic routing between the virtual networks, which should enable Client1 to communicate with Vnet2.

upvoted 0 times