Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 4 Question 41 Discussion

Posted by Tyra on Apr 25, 2023 at 04:06 PM

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have two Azure virtual networks named Vnet1 and Vnet2.

You have a Windows 10 device named Client1 that connects to Vnet1 by using a Point-to-Site (P2S) IKEv2 VPN.

You implement virtual network peering between Vnet1 and Vnet2. Vnet1 allows gateway transit. Vnet2 can use the remote gateway.

You discover that Client1 cannot communicate with Vnet2.

You need to ensure that Client1 can communicate with Vnet2.

Solution: You enable BGP on the gateway of Vnet1.

Does this meet the goal?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
CA
Carma 12 months ago
Just enabling BGP won't fix Client1's access to Vnet2.
KE
Kendra 12 months ago
No way, this won't solve the communication issue.
CH
Chantell 1 year ago
Wait, I thought BGP was for routing between networks?
BO
Bobbie 1 year ago
Totally agree, enabling BGP won't help here.
RO
Rochell 1 year ago
BGP isn't necessary for P2S connections.
JA
Jani 1 year ago
I feel like the issue might be related to the VPN configuration rather than BGP. I need to double-check the requirements for P2S connections.
BR
Brock 1 year ago
From what I practiced, I believe enabling BGP might not directly solve the communication problem since it's more about routing updates, not connectivity.
YO
Youlanda 1 year ago
I think I came across a similar question where enabling BGP was mentioned, but I can't recall if it was the right solution for communication issues.
RO
Rolland 1 year ago
I remember studying BGP and its role in routing, but I'm not sure if enabling it on Vnet1 will actually help Client1 reach Vnet2.
LE
Leeann 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward configuration issue. I'll carefully review the options and think through where the voicemail pilot number should be set.
EZ
Ezekiel 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the devfsadm command. I'll need to double-check the details on that before selecting an answer.
RE
Reiko 1 year ago
The solution seems reasonable, but I can't help but wonder if there's a more elegant way to achieve the goal. Maybe we could just call the Azure fairies and have them wave their magic wands?
AR
Arleen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reiko
User4: Calling the Azure fairies might be a bit of a stretch, but it's worth considering all possibilities.
ZO
Zona 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reiko
User3: Maybe we should explore other options before going with that.
LY
Lynsey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reiko
User2: Yeah, that sounds like a solid solution.
SO
Sophia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reiko
User1: I think enabling BGP on the gateway of Vnet1 should do the trick.
MO
Mozell 1 year ago
Ah, the age-old question of virtual network peering. If it doesn't work, just add more routing protocols! It's like playing Tetris with network configurations.
KA
Kathryn 1 year ago
Hold on, does this mean I'll have to configure BGP on my poor little Windows 10 device? That sounds like a lot of work! Can't we just use some kind of magic Azure button instead?
EV
Eve 1 year ago
I'm not sure that enabling BGP is the right solution here. Isn't there another way to enable connectivity between the virtual networks without modifying the VPN client's configuration?
BR
Brigette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eve
B) No
HO
Howard 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eve
I think enabling BGP on the gateway of Vnet1 might be the right solution to ensure connectivity between the virtual networks.
SH
Shad 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eve
B) No
JU
Jutta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Eve
A) Yes
MA
Malcolm 1 year ago
Enabling BGP on the Vnet1 gateway is a good solution. It allows for dynamic routing between the virtual networks, which should enable Client1 to communicate with Vnet2.
TR
Tracie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
That makes sense. BGP will help with dynamic routing between the virtual networks.
TE
Tegan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
Enabling BGP on the Vnet1 gateway should allow Client1 to communicate with Vnet2.
AF
Afton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
A) Yes
MA
Maurine 2 years ago
So, should we go with option A) Yes then?
HE
Hector 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think enabling BGP on Vnet1 might help Client1 communicate with Vnet2.
MA
Maurine 2 years ago
I think the solution is to enable BGP on the gateway of Vnet1.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel