Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam

Question #: 11
Topic #: 4

Your company has offices in Montreal. Seattle, and Paris. The outbound traffic from each office originates from a specific public IP address.

You create an Azure Front Door instance named FD1 that has Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) enabled. You configure a WAF policy named Policy! that has a rule named Rule1. Rule1 applies a rate limit of 100 requests for traffic that originates from the office in Montreal.

You need to apply a rate limit of 100 requests for traffic that originates from each office.

What should you do?

AModify the conditions of Rule1.

BCreate two additional associations.

CModify the rule type of Rule1.

DModify the rate limit threshold of Rule1.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Alex at May 04, 2022, 03:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Shanice

4 months ago

I thought you could just adjust the conditions instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

4 months ago

Modifying Rule1 won't cover all offices, so B makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Buffy

4 months ago

Wait, can you really apply the same rate limit to different IPs like that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

5 months ago

Totally agree, option B is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Terry

5 months ago

Just need to create two more rules for the other offices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jean

5 months ago

I thought we had to change the rule type for it to apply to different sources, but now I'm questioning if that's necessary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

5 months ago

I feel like modifying the conditions of Rule1 could work, but I can't recall if that would apply to all offices or just Montreal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micaela

5 months ago

This seems similar to a practice question where we had to create multiple rules for different IPs. I think creating additional associations might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harris

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how to apply rate limits in WAF policies, but I'm not sure if modifying Rule1 is enough for all offices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thaddeus

5 months ago

Hmm, this one has me a bit stumped. I know we covered custom metadata types in class, but I'm having trouble remembering the specific data types involved. I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruth

5 months ago

Okay, let me see here. The question mentions the customer is redirected to a page to download the app, so that rules out SMTP which is for email. I'm leaning towards HTTP or HTTPS, but I'll have to double-check the differences between those two protocols.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karl

5 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The solution is to ensure the users have the server certificate installed on their devices. That should resolve the trust issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards "All of the above," but I can't quite recall if understanding by the person being arrested is actually necessary.

upvoted 0 times

...

otwb2pX

2 years ago

C. On the conditions rule, we can set more than one IP https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/web-application-firewall/afds/waf-front-door-configure-ip-restriction#create-a-waf-policy You decide to create a rate-limit rule that restricts each source IP address to a maximum of 1,000 requests per minute From Requests from the same client often arrive at the same Azure Front Door server. In that case, you see requests are blocked as soon as the rate limit is reached for each of the client IP addresses From

upvoted 1 times

...