Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 3 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam

Question #: 67
Topic #: 3

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it as a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure Front Door Premium profile named AFD1 and an Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) policy named WAF1. AFD1 is associated with WAF1.

You need to configure a rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1.

Solution: You configure a managed rule for WAF1.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Graham at Aug 27, 2024, 02:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Malcolm

10 months ago

Yes, but only if you configure it correctly!

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

10 months ago

Wait, can WAF1 even handle rate limits?

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

10 months ago

Totally agree, it’s not the right solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myong

10 months ago

I think it doesn't actually set a rate limit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilda

10 months ago

A managed rule can help with rate limiting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Markus

11 months ago

I’m pretty confident that just using a managed rule won’t meet the goal. I think we need to implement a specific rate limit rule for it to work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rene

11 months ago

I'm a bit unsure, but I thought managed rules were more about general security rather than specific rate limiting. Maybe we need to look at custom rules instead?

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

11 months ago

I feel like I've seen a similar question before, and it was about using custom rules for rate limiting. Managed rules might not cover that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Essie

11 months ago

I think configuring a managed rule for WAF1 might not directly set a rate limit for AFD1. I remember something about needing specific rate limiting rules instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

11 months ago

I got this! Configuring the managed rule on the WAF policy is the way to go. The question states that's the solution, so I'm confident that's the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

11 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. Since the Front Door profile and WAF policy are linked, I bet I could configure the rate limit directly on the Front Door profile instead of the WAF policy. I'll have to double-check the documentation to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albina

11 months ago

Wait, I'm a bit confused. Doesn't the question mention that the Front Door profile is associated with the WAF policy? I'm not sure if that's the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christiane

11 months ago

Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think configuring a managed rule for the WAF policy should do the trick to set up the rate limit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Haley

11 months ago

The tester's lack of coding experience makes me think they'd be better suited for the integration testing phase rather than developing or executing unit tests. That seems like the most logical fit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dong

12 months ago

Ah, I remember learning about this in class. The key can be anything, but the value can't be another mapping or struct. I'm pretty confident that option C is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

2 years ago

I'm not sure, but I think it might not fully meet the goal. Maybe we need to consider other options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyndy

2 years ago

Absolutely, the managed rules in the WAF policy are the way to go for rate limiting on the Front Door. Nicely done!

upvoted 0 times

...

Mel

2 years ago

Haha, of course the answer is yes! I'd be surprised if anyone didn't know that one. Managed rules in the WAF, easy peasy.

upvoted 0 times

Jina

2 years ago

Definitely, managed rules in the WAF are the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brett

2 years ago

Agreed, that's the correct solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casie

2 years ago

Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

2 years ago

But what about the rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1? Will configuring a managed rule for WAF1 address that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Monte

2 years ago

I agree with Susana, configuring a managed rule for WAF1 should meet the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cortney

2 years ago

Configuring the WAF policy is the way to do it. Gotta love those managed rules, they make life so much easier.

upvoted 0 times

Nieves

2 years ago

Absolutely, they make managing security policies a breeze.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

2 years ago

Managed rules are definitely a lifesaver when it comes to setting up rate limits.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lilli

2 years ago

That's right, configuring a managed rule for the WAF policy is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erinn

2 years ago

Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

2 years ago

I think the solution is to configure a managed rule for WAF1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fidelia

2 years ago

Yup, that's the way to go. Managed rules in the WAF policy can definitely help control the rate of requests hitting the Front Door.

upvoted 0 times

Onita

2 years ago

Agreed, using managed rules in the WAF policy is the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casandra

2 years ago

Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Merlyn

2 years ago

Yes, this is the correct solution. Configuring a managed rule for the WAF policy associated with the Azure Front Door profile is the way to set up a rate limit for incoming requests.

upvoted 0 times

Leandro

2 years ago

Great, thanks for confirming!

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearline

2 years ago

Yes, that is correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

2 years ago

Yes

upvoted 0 times

...