Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 3 Question 67 Discussion

Posted by Graham on Aug 27, 2024 at 02:59 AM

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it as a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure Front Door Premium profile named AFD1 and an Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) policy named WAF1. AFD1 is associated with WAF1.

You need to configure a rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1.

Solution: You configure a managed rule for WAF1.

Does this meet the goal?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
MA
Malcolm 11 months ago
Yes, but only if you configure it correctly!
MA
Margurite 11 months ago
Wait, can WAF1 even handle rate limits?
BA
Barrett 11 months ago
Totally agree, it’s not the right solution.
MY
Myong 12 months ago
I think it doesn't actually set a rate limit.
IL
Ilda 1 year ago
A managed rule can help with rate limiting.
MA
Markus 1 year ago
I’m pretty confident that just using a managed rule won’t meet the goal. I think we need to implement a specific rate limit rule for it to work.
RE
Rene 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I thought managed rules were more about general security rather than specific rate limiting. Maybe we need to look at custom rules instead?
EL
Eladia 1 year ago
I feel like I've seen a similar question before, and it was about using custom rules for rate limiting. Managed rules might not cover that.
ES
Essie 1 year ago
I think configuring a managed rule for WAF1 might not directly set a rate limit for AFD1. I remember something about needing specific rate limiting rules instead.
FR
Francesco 1 year ago
I got this! Configuring the managed rule on the WAF policy is the way to go. The question states that's the solution, so I'm confident that's the right approach.
JI
Jina 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. Since the Front Door profile and WAF policy are linked, I bet I could configure the rate limit directly on the Front Door profile instead of the WAF policy. I'll have to double-check the documentation to be sure.
AL
Albina 1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Doesn't the question mention that the Front Door profile is associated with the WAF policy? I'm not sure if that's the right approach.
CH
Christiane 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think configuring a managed rule for the WAF policy should do the trick to set up the rate limit.
HA
Haley 1 year ago
The tester's lack of coding experience makes me think they'd be better suited for the integration testing phase rather than developing or executing unit tests. That seems like the most logical fit.
DO
Dong 1 year ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. The key can be anything, but the value can't be another mapping or struct. I'm pretty confident that option C is the correct answer.
SU
Susana 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might not fully meet the goal. Maybe we need to consider other options.
CY
Cyndy 2 years ago
Absolutely, the managed rules in the WAF policy are the way to go for rate limiting on the Front Door. Nicely done!
ME
Mel 2 years ago
Haha, of course the answer is yes! I'd be surprised if anyone didn't know that one. Managed rules in the WAF, easy peasy.
JI
Jina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Mel
Definitely, managed rules in the WAF are the way to go.
BR
Brett 2 years ago
↳ replying to Mel
Agreed, that's the correct solution.
CA
Casie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Mel
Yes
KA
Kallie 2 years ago
But what about the rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1? Will configuring a managed rule for WAF1 address that?
MO
Monte 2 years ago
I agree with Susana, configuring a managed rule for WAF1 should meet the goal.
CO
Cortney 2 years ago
Configuring the WAF policy is the way to do it. Gotta love those managed rules, they make life so much easier.
NI
Nieves 2 years ago
↳ replying to Cortney
Absolutely, they make managing security policies a breeze.
MA
Malcom 2 years ago
↳ replying to Cortney
Managed rules are definitely a lifesaver when it comes to setting up rate limits.
LI
Lilli 2 years ago
↳ replying to Cortney
That's right, configuring a managed rule for the WAF policy is the way to go.
ER
Erinn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Cortney
Yes
SU
Susana 2 years ago
I think the solution is to configure a managed rule for WAF1.
FI
Fidelia 2 years ago
Yup, that's the way to go. Managed rules in the WAF policy can definitely help control the rate of requests hitting the Front Door.
ON
Onita 2 years ago
↳ replying to Fidelia
Agreed, using managed rules in the WAF policy is the right approach.
CA
Casandra 2 years ago
↳ replying to Fidelia
Yes
ME
Merlyn 2 years ago
Yes, this is the correct solution. Configuring a managed rule for the WAF policy associated with the Azure Front Door profile is the way to set up a rate limit for incoming requests.
LE
Leandro 2 years ago
↳ replying to Merlyn
Great, thanks for confirming!
PE
Pearline 2 years ago
↳ replying to Merlyn
Yes, that is correct.
JI
Jina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Merlyn
Yes
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel