SIMULATION
Task 9
You need to ensure that subnet4-3 can accommodate 507 hosts.
Suggested Answer: A, D
Get Premium AZ-700 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
ME
Meaghan
11 months ago
I thought /23 only covered 512 addresses, not 507.
MA
Maybelle
11 months ago
Yup, /23 is the way to go!
BR
Broderick
12 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the subnet size? Seems off.
SH
Shad
12 months ago
Totally agree, that gives us 510 usable IPs.
MI
Micaela
1 year ago
Subnetting for 507 hosts needs a /23 mask.
LE
Letha
1 year ago
I feel like I should double-check the powers of 2 for the subnetting. I know 512 is 2^9, but does that mean we need a /23 mask?
VI
Viki
1 year ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to find the subnet for 300 hosts. I think we used a /23 subnet for that one.
VA
Valentin
1 year ago
I’m a bit unsure about the exact number of bits we need for the hosts. Was it 9 bits for 512 hosts? I hope I’m remembering that right.
SA
Sabra
1 year ago
I think we need to calculate the subnet mask that can support at least 507 hosts. I remember something about using the formula 2^n - 2.
WI
Willow
1 year ago
Journey Builder seems like a good option, as it can help you create personalized customer journeys that incorporate data from multiple Salesforce clouds.
ZA
Zana
1 year ago
I remember practicing questions similar to this, and I think I leaned towards option A, but I'm not totally sure if "comprehensive view" fits the definition we're looking for.
PA
Paris
1 year ago
SHA might also work, but I'm not as confident that it can fully prevent those types of attacks. I'm leaning towards C.
EM
Emiko
1 year ago
Hey, at least it's not asking about 666 hosts. That would just be asking for trouble.
ED
Edda
1 year ago
507 hosts, huh? That's like the number of times I've re-read the question to make sure I'm not missing something obvious.
OD
Odette
1 year ago
Great job! Make sure to update the subnet mask and address range accordingly.
BL
Blair
1 year ago
Yes, I calculated that subnet4-3 needs at least a /23 subnet mask to accommodate 507 hosts.
KR
Kristine
1 year ago
Have you checked the subnet mask and calculated the number of available host addresses?
PA
Paz
1 year ago
I know, it can be tricky to make sure you're understanding the requirements correctly.
ES
Essie
1 year ago
I bet the answer is just 'see the explanation' because the exam writer got tired of coming up with creative multiple-choice options.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
Alright, let's see what the explanation has. I'm sure it'll be straightforward and not at all convoluted.
PO
Portia
1 year ago
User3: I'm sure we can figure it out together if it's confusing.
DA
Dahlia
1 year ago
User2: Let's check it out and see if we can make sense of it.
SH
Shoshana
1 year ago
User 3: I'm sure it will be helpful.
DE
Deandrea
1 year ago
User1: I hope the explanation is clear and easy to follow.
SA
Samuel
1 year ago
User 2: I hope it's easy to follow.
HU
Huey
1 year ago
User 1: Let's check out the explanation for subnet4-3.
RU
Rupert
1 year ago
Wait, 507 hosts? That's oddly specific. Is the exam question trying to trick us?
ST
Staci
1 year ago
User 3: Let's follow the instructions and see how we can accommodate that many hosts.
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
User 2: Maybe they want to see if we can calculate the subnet size accurately.
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
User 1: I know, 507 hosts seems like a random number.
EL
Elfrieda
2 years ago
Yes, we should also consider the network and broadcast addresses in our calculation.
EL
Elly
2 years ago
I think we need to calculate the number of host bits needed for 507 hosts.
EL
Elfrieda
2 years ago
How do we ensure subnet4-3 can accommodate 507 hosts?