New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 14 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 14
[All AZ-700 Questions]

You are configuring two network virtual appliances (NVAs) in an Azure virtual network. The NVAs will be used to inspect all the traffic within the virtual network.

You need to provide high availability for the NVAs. The solution must minimize administrative effort. What should you include in the solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Alesia
4 months ago
I agree, Standard Load Balancer seems like the simplest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
4 months ago
Surprised Azure Front Door isn't the top pick here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
4 months ago
Azure Application Gateway is great, but not sure if it fits this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
4 months ago
I think Azure Traffic Manager is a better choice for global distribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
5 months ago
Definitely go with Azure Standard Load Balancer for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards Azure Standard Load Balancer too, but I wonder if there are any specific configurations we need to consider for NVAs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
5 months ago
I feel like Azure Application Gateway could be a good option, but I’m not certain if it’s specifically designed for NVAs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think Azure Traffic Manager is more about routing traffic across regions rather than just balancing it within a VNet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
5 months ago
I think we might need the Azure Standard Load Balancer for high availability, but I'm not completely sure if it's the best choice for NVAs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about the difference between the options here. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The con() function is the way to go, and checking for the NoData value directly in the expression is the key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
5 months ago
Hmm, this one seems straightforward. I'm pretty sure the correct term is "upcasting", not "downcasting", so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions the "triple bottom line," but I'm not totally clear on what that means in this context. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
5 months ago
Honestly, I lean towards option D. The interactions might not be clear enough to define the exact number.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel