Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam

Question #: 50
Topic #: 1

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it as a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure Front Door Premium profile named AFD1 and an Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) policy named WAF1. AFD1 is associated with WAFT.

You need to configure a rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1.

Solution: You configure a custom rule for WAF1.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Topic 4, Labs / Tasks

by Deonna at Dec 10, 2023, 06:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ozell

4 months ago

Custom rules are definitely the way to go for rate limiting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Odelia

4 months ago

Surprised this is even a question, seems straightforward!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherill

4 months ago

No way, that won't limit the requests properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

4 months ago

I think it should work, but double-check the settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delbert

5 months ago

Yes, that’s the right way to do it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

5 months ago

I thought we needed to use a specific feature in Azure Front Door for rate limiting, so I’m leaning towards "No" for this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronna

5 months ago

I feel like WAF policies can handle rate limiting, but I’m a bit confused about whether it’s the best method for Azure Front Door.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

5 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question where we had to set up rules in WAF, but I can't recall if rate limiting was specifically covered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

5 months ago

I think configuring a custom rule for WAF1 might actually work for rate limiting, but I'm not entirely sure if it’s the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luz

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the question states the solution is to configure a custom rule for WAF1. Since the question is asking if this meets the goal, the answer is likely yes. I'll go with that unless I see something that clearly indicates another approach would be better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilberto

5 months ago

I'm not sure about this one. The question says there might be more than one correct solution, so I don't want to jump to conclusions. I think I'll need to review the Azure Front Door and WAF documentation to see if there are other ways to configure a rate limit for the AFD1 profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefanie

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that configuring a custom rule in WAF1 is the right approach here. Azure Front Door and Azure WAF work together, so it makes sense that the rate limit would be set up in the WAF policy associated with the Front Door profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions that AFD1 is associated with WAF1, but it doesn't explicitly say that the rate limit needs to be configured in WAF1. I'm not sure if configuring a custom rule in WAF1 is the only way to meet the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melodie

6 months ago

I think I know how to approach this. The question is asking if configuring a custom rule for the WAF1 policy meets the goal of configuring a rate limit for incoming requests to the AFD1 profile. Since the question states that AFD1 is associated with WAF1, it seems like the custom rule in WAF1 could be the way to configure the rate limit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ria

6 months ago

I'm confident the answer is C. The DKIM public key needs to be published in a DNS TXT record so that recipients can verify the email signature.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ranee

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a lot of factors to consider when it comes to customer service in healthcare. I'll need to read through the options carefully to make sure I don't miss anything.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maile

6 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about the key elements to include in a draft policy. I'd start by focusing on the rationale and the roles and responsibilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johanna

6 months ago

I've got this! The requirement is clearly a functional requirement, as it's describing a specific capability the system needs to have - the ability to view policies from the legacy system. The fact that it's related to decommissioning the legacy system doesn't change the fact that it's a functional need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

2 years ago

You know, I was thinking the same thing as Lewis. Configuring the rate limit on the AFD1 profile itself feels like the more logical approach. But hey, maybe the question is trying to trick us! I'm still undecided on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latonia

2 years ago

Haha, this exam is really testing our Azure knowledge, isn't it? I'm going to go with 'B) No' on this one. Seems like there might be a more direct way to configure the rate limit that doesn't involve the WAF policy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lewis

2 years ago

Hmm, I think this might work, but I'm a little hesitant. Wouldn't it be better to configure the rate limit directly on the AFD1 profile instead of using the WAF policy? That seems more straightforward to me.

upvoted 0 times

Cortney

2 years ago

A: That makes sense, thanks for explaining.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitzie

2 years ago

B: I see your point, but using the WAF policy allows for more granular control and customization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

2 years ago

A: But wouldn't it be simpler to configure it directly on the AFD1 profile?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorethea

2 years ago

B: Because the custom rule for WAF1 can help in configuring the rate limit for incoming requests.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

2 years ago

A: Why do you think it will work?

upvoted 0 times

...

Miles

2 years ago

B: No

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

2 years ago

A: Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Tori

2 years ago

I'm not sure about this question. Configuring a rate limit for incoming requests to AFD1 using a custom rule in WAF1 seems like a reasonable approach, but I'm not confident that it will meet the goal. We'd need to double-check the documentation to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...