Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-305 Exam - Topic 9 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 9
[All AZ-305 Questions]

Your on-premises datacenter contains a server that runs Linux and hosts a Java app named Appl. App1 has the following characteristics:

* App1 is an interactive app that users access by using HTTPS connections.

* The number of connections to App1 changes significantly throughout the day.

* App1 runs multiple concurrent instances.

* App1 requires major changes to run in a container.

You plan to migrate App1 to Azure.

You need to recommend a compute solution for Appl. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* The solution must run multiple instances of Appl.

* The number of instances must be managed automatically depending on the load.

* Administrative effort must be minimized.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lawrence at Jan 28, 2024, 11:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ligia
4 months ago
Definitely not Azure Batch, it doesn't fit the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
4 months ago
Surprised they didn't mention Azure Functions for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
4 months ago
Azure Virtual Machine Scale Sets could work too, but more admin work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
5 months ago
I think Azure Kubernetes Service might be overkill for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
5 months ago
Azure App Service is perfect for auto-scaling!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
5 months ago
I have a vague memory of Azure Batch being used for batch processing, so I don't think that's the right answer here, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where Azure Virtual Machine Scale Sets were mentioned, but I feel like they might not be the best choice for minimizing admin effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
5 months ago
I think Azure Kubernetes Service could be a good fit since it can manage multiple instances, but I recall it might require more administrative effort than what we want.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
5 months ago
I remember studying about Azure App Service and how it can handle scaling automatically, but I'm not sure if it supports all the requirements for an interactive app like this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the "major changes to run in a container" requirement. That makes me hesitant to recommend Azure App Service, as it might not be the best fit. Azure Kubernetes Service could be a better option to handle the containerization needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
5 months ago
Azure Batch seems like overkill for this type of application. The requirements around auto-scaling and minimal administrative effort point more towards Azure App Service or Azure Virtual Machine Scale Sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit torn between Azure App Service and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS). AKS would give us more control and flexibility, but App Service might be the simpler option for this scenario. I'll need to weigh the tradeoffs carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
6 months ago
This seems like a classic case of needing a scalable and managed compute solution for a Java app. I'm leaning towards Azure App Service since it handles the auto-scaling and administrative overhead for us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I'm not sure if a forced takeover is the best approach here. Maybe we should try rebooting Node02 first with the bypass-optimization option to see if that brings the cluster back online.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about contract renewal best practices. I'll carefully read through the options and think about what's most important when renewing a contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
6 months ago
I feel like option A seems too focused on marketing and new products rather than actual customer success metrics, which should maybe focus more on completion and benchmarking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
6 months ago
I think the key is remembering that more specific styles override more general ones. So internal styles would override external ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
2 years ago
I'm leaning more towards AKS. The fact that the app requires major changes to run in a container makes me think that going with a container-based solution like AKS might be the way to go. Plus, it meets all the requirements mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
2 years ago
You know, I was just reading about Azure Virtual Machine Scale Sets the other day. That could also be a viable option since it can automatically scale the VMs based on load. But I'm not sure if that would be the best fit since the question mentions the app requires major changes to run in a container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. Azure App Service could be a good fit since it can automatically scale the instances based on load, and it minimizes administrative effort. But AKS might also work well since it can handle the multiple concurrent instances and the ability to scale.
upvoted 0 times
Tori
2 years ago
A) That's a good point. Ultimately, the choice between Azure App Service, AKS, and Azure Virtual Machine Scale Sets will depend on the specific needs and expertise of the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
2 years ago
B) AKS might be more complex to set up initially, but it offers more control and flexibility over the containerized Java app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 years ago
D) Azure Virtual Machine Scale Sets could also meet the requirement of running multiple instances and managing them automatically based on load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
2 years ago
C) True, but Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) might provide more flexibility in managing the instances and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 years ago
D) I think Azure App Service is better in terms of minimizing administrative effort and ease of use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
2 years ago
B) Yes, that's true. But Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) can also handle the multiple concurrent instances and has the ability to scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 years ago
A) Azure App Service could be a good fit since it can automatically scale the instances based on load, and it minimizes administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carma
2 years ago
Hmm, this question seems tricky. The app has some specific requirements, like being interactive and having varying loads throughout the day. I'm thinking Azure App Service or Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) could be good options to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel