Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-305 Exam - Topic 7 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 7
[All AZ-305 Questions]

You have an application named App1. App1 generates log files that must be archived for five years. The log files must be readable by App1 but must not be modified.

Which storage solution should you recommend for archiving?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Linn at Feb 24, 2023, 11:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Delfina
5 months ago
Not sure about that, sounds risky to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
6 months ago
Wait, can App1 really read files from the Archive tier?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
6 months ago
Definitely going with C, it meets all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
6 months ago
I think B could work too, but not as secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
6 months ago
Option C is the best choice for long-term archiving.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
6 months ago
Option D seems off to me; I don't think a file share would meet the requirement for immutability like the other options might.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
6 months ago
I feel like I saw a question similar to this in practice exams, and I think they recommended using a Blob storage account, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about Azure Blob storage being a good fit for archiving. Maybe option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
6 months ago
I think option C might be the right choice since it mentions the Archive access tier, which is designed for long-term storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Server Protect can take some actions, but I'm not sure if I remember all the specific options. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the differences between the review types. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'd have to review the different options more closely to determine the best solution. Modifying the Records State Transition table or the IncidentState script include could also work, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
7 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We need to calculate the total cash investment required for the expansion, which includes the new equipment and the changes in current assets and liabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
11 months ago
Archiving logs for 5 years? Might as well just carve them into stone tablets. C is the sensible choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Jame
10 months ago
Agreed. It's the best option for keeping the logs secure and accessible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
11 months ago
That's a good point. Archiving in the Archive access tier makes sense for long-term storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
11 months ago
C) Use an Azure Blob storage account configured to use the Archive access tier
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reena
11 months ago
Hey, at least it's not option A! Ingesting logs into Log Analytics would be overkill for this use case. C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
12 months ago
Hmm, I was torn between B and C, but C makes more sense. Gotta love that Archive tier for long-term storage needs!
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
10 months ago
The Archive access tier is definitely the way to go for archiving log files for five years.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
10 months ago
User1: Exactly, it's the best option for archiving log files for five years.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
10 months ago
I think using Azure Blob storage with a time-based retention policy would also work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
10 months ago
User2: Definitely, it ensures the log files are stored securely and can't be modified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
11 months ago
User1: I agree, the Archive access tier is perfect for long-term storage needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
11 months ago
I agree, the Archive access tier is perfect for long-term storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
1 year ago
I was thinking B, but C is probably better since the logs need to be readable for 5 years. The Archive tier will keep the costs down compared to hot storage.
upvoted 0 times
Elise
11 months ago
C) Use an Azure Blob storage account configured to use the Archive access tier
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
12 months ago
B) Use an Azure Blob storage account and a time-based retention policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
12 months ago
I was thinking B, but C is probably better since the logs need to be readable for 5 years. The Archive tier will keep the costs down compared to hot storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
12 months ago
C) Use an Azure Blob storage account configured to use the Archive access tier
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
12 months ago
B) Use an Azure Blob storage account and a time-based retention policy
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gennie
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't using Azure Log Analytics workspace be a better option for easy access and analysis?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best choice to me. Archiving the logs in an Azure Blob storage account with the Archive access tier will keep them readable by the app while ensuring they aren't modified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 year ago
I agree with Delsie. It ensures the log files are stored securely and can be accessed when needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 year ago
I think we should use Azure Blob storage with a time-based retention policy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel