MENU
You have an on-premises network to which you deploy a virtual appliance.
You plan to deploy several Azure virtual machines and connect the on-premises network to Azure by using a Site-to-Site connection.
All network traffic that will be directed from the Azure virtual machines to a specific subnet must flow through the virtual appliance.
You need to recommend solutions to manage network traffic.
Which two options should you recommend? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium AZ-305 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
TI
Tiera
11 months ago
Wait, I thought you couldn't route traffic through a virtual appliance like that?
LE
Leoma
11 months ago
ExpressRoute could be overkill for just a Site-to-Site connection.
MI
Mira
11 months ago
Not sure about Azure Traffic Manager being relevant here.
BE
Beckie
12 months ago
Agree, Azure virtual network is a must for this setup!
AL
Alesia
12 months ago
Definitely need to configure a routing table for that traffic.
LI
Ligia
1 year ago
Implementing an Azure virtual network seems like a must, but I can't recall if it's enough on its own without the routing table.
DY
Dyan
1 year ago
I feel like ExpressRoute might be overkill for this scenario, but it does provide a private connection, which could be beneficial.
SH
Shanda
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about Azure Traffic Manager being relevant here; I thought it was more for load balancing rather than managing traffic through a specific appliance.
GE
Georgeanna
1 year ago
I remember we talked about routing tables in class, and I think they can help direct traffic through the virtual appliance.
BE
Bernadine
1 year ago
I feel confident that configuring a routing table and implementing an Azure virtual network would be the two best options to recommend for this scenario.
CA
Carolynn
1 year ago
Implementing ExpressRoute could be a good solution to connect the on-premises network to Azure, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach for managing the network traffic specifically.
DA
Dalene
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between Azure Traffic Manager and an Azure virtual network. I'll need to review those options more closely.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I think configuring a routing table might be a good option to ensure the traffic flows through the virtual appliance as needed.
DO
Dominque
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around the virtual appliance and the need to route traffic through it.
BE
Ben
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I know vSphere Namespaces have something to do with sharing a Kubernetes cluster, but I'm not clear on the details. I'll have to think this through carefully.
JE
Jeanice
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure why the certificate authority said it's not necessary to add the certificate to the CRL. I'll have to think through the options carefully.
NI
Nicolette
1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The information provided seems straightforward, I just need to apply my knowledge.
MA
Marci
1 year ago
I'm going to have to agree with the other candidates. B and D are the right answers here. Though I did chuckle at the ExpressRoute suggestion - that's overkill for this scenario!
OZ
Ozell
1 year ago
Yeah, ExpressRoute seems like too much for what we need. B and D are the way to go.
LO
Lonny
1 year ago
Agreed, we also need to configure a routing table to manage the network traffic.
CH
Cherri
1 year ago
I think we should go with option B, implementing an Azure virtual network.
BR
Brendan
2 years ago
Definitely B and D. Configuring a routing table is key to ensuring the traffic is routed through the virtual appliance. Traffic Manager is for load balancing, not for this specific requirement.
KI
Kirk
1 year ago
Configuring a routing table is crucial to control the flow of traffic and ensure it passes through the virtual appliance as required.
EV
Evan
1 year ago
Yes, those two options will ensure that all traffic from the Azure virtual machines to the specific subnet goes through the virtual appliance.
VI
Vicki
1 year ago
That's correct, Azure Traffic Manager is not the right solution for managing network traffic in this scenario.
GI
Gilma
1 year ago
I agree, implementing an Azure virtual network and configuring a routing table are essential for managing network traffic.
FE
Felicia
1 year ago
Yes, configuring a routing table will ensure that all traffic from the Azure virtual machines flows through the virtual appliance.
KA
Kayleigh
1 year ago
I agree, implementing an Azure virtual network is essential for connecting the on-premises network to Azure.
MI
Michael
2 years ago
Ha! C is a good one. ExpressRoute is for a dedicated private connection to Azure, not for managing network traffic within a virtual network. B and D are the way to go.
CA
Caitlin
2 years ago
I'm not sure about B. Wouldn't we need to configure the routing table within the virtual network to ensure the traffic flows through the virtual appliance? I'd go with B and D.
AR
Arlen
2 years ago
I think the correct answers are B and D. Implementing an Azure virtual network and configuring a routing table to route the traffic through the virtual appliance seem like the logical solutions here.
FR
Francoise
1 year ago
Yes, and configuring a routing table will ensure that the traffic flows through the virtual appliance.
AS
Ashanti
2 years ago
I agree, implementing an Azure virtual network will help with the connection.
ME
Merlyn
2 years ago
I also think configuring a routing table is necessary to ensure all traffic flows through the virtual appliance.
ED
Edward
2 years ago
I agree with Steffanie. Implementing an Azure virtual network will help manage network traffic efficiently.
ST
Steffanie
2 years ago
I think we should implement an Azure virtual network.