Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-305 Exam - Topic 4 Question 48 Discussion

You need to deploy resources to host a stateless web app in an Azure subscription. The solution must meet the following requirements:* Provide access to the full .NET framework.* Provide redundancy if an Azure region fails.* Grant administrators access to the operating system to install custom application dependencies.Solution: You deploy an Azure virtual machine scale set that uses autoscaling.Does this meet the goal?
A) Yes
B) No

Microsoft AZ-305 Exam - Topic 4 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-305 Questions]

You need to deploy resources to host a stateless web app in an Azure subscription. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* Provide access to the full .NET framework.

* Provide redundancy if an Azure region fails.

* Grant administrators access to the operating system to install custom application dependencies.

Solution: You deploy an Azure virtual machine scale set that uses autoscaling.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lemuel at Dec 25, 2023, 05:20 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Chandra
10 months ago
Definitely meets the goal, especially with .NET framework support!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
10 months ago
It’s a solid solution, but I’d double-check the OS access part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
10 months ago
Wait, can you really install custom dependencies on a scale set?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
10 months ago
Totally agree, this meets all the requirements!
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
10 months ago
Yes, VM scale sets provide redundancy and autoscaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards "Yes" because VMs can be configured for the full .NET framework, but I’m not entirely confident about the stateless part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
11 months ago
I feel like we covered something similar in class, but I can't recall if autoscaling alone is enough for redundancy across regions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
11 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed the need for full OS access. A VM scale set should allow that, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
11 months ago
I think deploying a virtual machine scale set does provide redundancy, but I'm not sure if it meets all the requirements for a stateless app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
11 months ago
I think the virtual machine scale set approach could work, but I'm not 100% sure it meets all the requirements. I'll need to review the details on the .NET framework support and the OS-level access to be confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. The virtual machine scale set should provide redundancy if an Azure region fails, and we can likely get the full .NET framework on the VMs. The OS-level access for custom dependencies is the tricky part - I'll need to double-check if that's possible with a scale set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The virtual machine scale set seems like it could provide redundancy, but I'm not sure if it would give us the full .NET framework and OS-level access that the requirements call for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully to determine if the proposed solution meets them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the implications of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
12 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think I'll go with a request scope variable since the question says there's no need to store the selection in any system or custom objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to match some key parameters, but I can't remember if the VLAN name or the Xconnect group name are also important. Let me think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
1 year ago
Redundancy, full .NET, and admin access? Sounds like a hosting nightmare to me. I'll take my chances with a good old-fashioned virtual machine, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
Chantay
1 year ago
Yeah, I don't think the scale set is necessary for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 year ago
Maybe a traditional virtual machine would be easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
1 year ago
I think I would prefer a simpler solution as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
1 year ago
I agree, that sounds like a lot of complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
1 year ago
Is this a trick question? Who doesn't love a little light OS tampering now and then? Where do I sign up for this 'custom dependencies' deal?
upvoted 0 times
Ming
1 year ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 year ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 year ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Billy
1 year ago
Hold up, you're telling me I can't get my hands on the OS? This is no good, I need to have that control. Definitely a 'No' vote here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure the virtual machine scale set allows administrators to install custom dependencies. Guess it's a 'No' from me.
upvoted 0 times
Theola
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with Theola, it doesn't meet the goal
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
1 year ago
User 3: Yes, the solution does not meet the goal of granting access to install custom dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
1 year ago
User 2: No
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed. We need a solution that grants administrators access to install custom dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
User 1: I think it's a 'No' too. Virtual machine scale set may not allow custom dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
1 year ago
User 1: Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fidelia
1 year ago
Autoscaling is a great feature, but it doesn't address the need for redundancy across regions. I'm not sure this solution is quite right.
upvoted 0 times
Michell
1 year ago
Trina: So what would be a better solution then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with Kris, autoscaling doesn't provide redundancy across regions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
1 year ago
User 2: No
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
1 year ago
User 1: Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
1 year ago
But it does provide redundancy if an Azure region fails, which is one of the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
1 year ago
I disagree. I don't think it provides access to the full .NET framework.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
The virtual machine scale set doesn't provide access to the full .NET framework, so this solution doesn't meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
I think deploying an Azure virtual machine scale set with autoscaling meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 year ago
But it does provide redundancy if an Azure region fails, which is one of the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
1 year ago
I disagree. I don't think it provides access to the full .NET framework.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 year ago
I think deploying an Azure virtual machine scale set with autoscaling meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel