MENU
You need to deploy resources to host a stateless web app in an Azure subscription. The solution must meet the following requirements:
* Provide access to the full .NET framework.
* Provide redundancy if an Azure region fails.
* Grant administrators access to the operating system to install custom application dependencies.
Solution: You deploy an Azure virtual machine scale set that uses autoscaling.
Does this meet the goal?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium AZ-305 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
45 comments · newest first
CH
Chandra
11 months ago
Definitely meets the goal, especially with .NET framework support!
MI
Mireya
11 months ago
It’s a solid solution, but I’d double-check the OS access part.
JI
Jina
12 months ago
Wait, can you really install custom dependencies on a scale set?
CH
Chanel
12 months ago
Totally agree, this meets all the requirements!
WE
Werner
1 year ago
Yes, VM scale sets provide redundancy and autoscaling.
WH
Whitney
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards "Yes" because VMs can be configured for the full .NET framework, but I’m not entirely confident about the stateless part.
LA
Lashon
1 year ago
I feel like we covered something similar in class, but I can't recall if autoscaling alone is enough for redundancy across regions.
LA
Lavonda
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed the need for full OS access. A VM scale set should allow that, right?
JO
Jonell
1 year ago
I think deploying a virtual machine scale set does provide redundancy, but I'm not sure if it meets all the requirements for a stateless app.
MA
Mattie
1 year ago
I think the virtual machine scale set approach could work, but I'm not 100% sure it meets all the requirements. I'll need to review the details on the .NET framework support and the OS-level access to be confident in my answer.
TR
Tresa
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The virtual machine scale set should provide redundancy if an Azure region fails, and we can likely get the full .NET framework on the VMs. The OS-level access for custom dependencies is the tricky part - I'll need to double-check if that's possible with a scale set.
BO
Bobbye
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The virtual machine scale set seems like it could provide redundancy, but I'm not sure if it would give us the full .NET framework and OS-level access that the requirements call for.
HU
Hubert
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully to determine if the proposed solution meets them.
MA
Marshall
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the implications of each approach.
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think I'll go with a request scope variable since the question says there's no need to store the selection in any system or custom objects.
MA
Maddie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to match some key parameters, but I can't remember if the VLAN name or the Xconnect group name are also important. Let me think this through carefully.
NO
Noah
1 year ago
Redundancy, full .NET, and admin access? Sounds like a hosting nightmare to me. I'll take my chances with a good old-fashioned virtual machine, thank you very much.
CH
Chantay
1 year ago
Yeah, I don't think the scale set is necessary for this scenario.
LO
Louis
1 year ago
Maybe a traditional virtual machine would be easier to manage.
RE
Regenia
1 year ago
I think I would prefer a simpler solution as well.
AN
Anissa
1 year ago
I agree, that sounds like a lot of complexity.
GE
Geoffrey
1 year ago
Is this a trick question? Who doesn't love a little light OS tampering now and then? Where do I sign up for this 'custom dependencies' deal?
MI
Ming
1 year ago
A) Yes
CA
Catalina
1 year ago
B) No
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
A) Yes
BI
Billy
1 year ago
Hold up, you're telling me I can't get my hands on the OS? This is no good, I need to have that control. Definitely a 'No' vote here.
DE
Detra
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure the virtual machine scale set allows administrators to install custom dependencies. Guess it's a 'No' from me.
TH
Theola
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with Theola, it doesn't meet the goal
LA
Lashawnda
1 year ago
User 3: Yes, the solution does not meet the goal of granting access to install custom dependencies.
MA
Matt
1 year ago
User 2: No
IL
Iluminada
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed. We need a solution that grants administrators access to install custom dependencies.
DI
Dierdre
1 year ago
User 1: I think it's a 'No' too. Virtual machine scale set may not allow custom dependencies.
DI
Dianne
1 year ago
User 1: Yes
FI
Fidelia
2 years ago
Autoscaling is a great feature, but it doesn't address the need for redundancy across regions. I'm not sure this solution is quite right.
MI
Michell
1 year ago
Trina: So what would be a better solution then?
KR
Kris
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with Kris, autoscaling doesn't provide redundancy across regions.
TR
Trina
1 year ago
User 2: No
FL
Flo
2 years ago
User 1: Yes
AN
Antonio
2 years ago
But it does provide redundancy if an Azure region fails, which is one of the requirements.
VI
Viva
2 years ago
I disagree. I don't think it provides access to the full .NET framework.
CL
Claudio
2 years ago
The virtual machine scale set doesn't provide access to the full .NET framework, so this solution doesn't meet the requirements.
AN
Antonio
2 years ago
I think deploying an Azure virtual machine scale set with autoscaling meets the goal.
NA
Natalya
2 years ago
But it does provide redundancy if an Azure region fails, which is one of the requirements.
SH
Sheron
2 years ago
I disagree. I don't think it provides access to the full .NET framework.
NA
Natalya
2 years ago
I think deploying an Azure virtual machine scale set with autoscaling meets the goal.