Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-305 Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 3
[All AZ-305 Questions]

You have an Azure subscription.

You need to recommend an Azure Kubernetes service (AKS) solution that will use Linux nodes. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* Minimize the time it takes to provision compute resources during scale-out operations.

* Support autoscaling of Linux containers.

* Minimize administrative effort.

Which scaling option should you recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Shonda at Apr 21, 2023, 08:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Haydee
3 months ago
Virtual nodes, huh? I thought we were talking about Azure, not the Matrix. As long as they don't start bullet-time-ing their way through the cluster, I'm on board.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
3 months ago
A) Virtual Kubetek? Is that like a Kubernetes node with a cape and superpowers? I'm going to have to go with C) virtual nodes on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Polly
2 months ago
C) I agree, D) horizontal pod autoscaler seems like the best option for autoscaling Linux containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 months ago
B) I think it's more about the functionality rather than superpowers. I would choose D) horizontal pod autoscaler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
A) Virtual Kubetek? Is that like a Kubernetes node with a cape and superpowers?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivette
4 months ago
D) horizontal pod autoscaler is the answer! It scales the number of pods in the cluster to meet the demands of the application. Much simpler than managing VMs or nodes.
upvoted 0 times
Yolando
3 months ago
C) virtual nodes could be considered, but horizontal pod autoscaler seems to be the best fit for minimizing administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
3 months ago
B) cluster autoscaler is also a good option for scaling out compute resources quickly and supporting autoscaling of containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
3 months ago
D) horizontal pod autoscaler is the answer! It scales the number of pods in the cluster to meet the demands of the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tegan
4 months ago
B) cluster autoscaler is the right choice. It can automatically scale the number of nodes in the cluster based on the resource needs of the containers. Plus, it's easy to manage compared to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
4 months ago
Looks like we need to minimize provisioning time and administrative effort. C) virtual nodes seems like the way to go here. It can scale up and down quickly without having to manage additional VMs.
upvoted 0 times
Frederica
3 months ago
Yes, virtual nodes can automatically scale up and down based on demand, making it a great choice for our requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
4 months ago
I agree, virtual nodes would be the best option for minimizing provisioning time and administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carline
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think virtual nodes could also be a good choice for autoscaling Linux containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
4 months ago
I agree with Dong. Horizontal pod autoscaler seems like the best option to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
5 months ago
I think the answer is D) horizontal pod autoscaler.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel