Microsoft Exam AZ-204 Topic 3 Question 114 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-204 exam

Question #: 114
Topic #: 3

You have an Azure API Management (APIM) Standard tier instance named APIM1 that uses a managed gateway.

You plan to use APIM1 to publish an API named API1 that uses a backend database that supports only a limited volume of requests per minute. You also need a policy for AP11 that will minimize the possibility that the number of requests to the backend database from an individual IP address you specify exceeds the supported limit.

You need to identify a policy for API1 that will meet the requirements.

Which policy should you use?

Aquota-by-key

Brate-limit

Cip-fitter

Drate-limit-by-key

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Rolf at Mar 06, 2025, 10:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-204 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Fernanda

2 months ago

I agree with Tess, A) quota-by-key seems like the best choice to meet the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

2 months ago

I think B) rate-limit could also be a valid option to consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vi

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) rate-limit-by-key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shasta

2 months ago

This is a tough one, but I think D is the way to go. Gotta keep those greedy IP addresses in check, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tess

2 months ago

I think the answer is A) quota-by-key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

2 months ago

Haha, I bet the backend database just can't handle all the traffic from the 'I love APIs' fan club. Better limit those requests, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Pok

27 days ago

C) ip-fitter

upvoted 0 times

...

Dyan

2 months ago

B) rate-limit

upvoted 0 times

...

Paz

2 months ago

A) quota-by-key

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashley

2 months ago

Wait, isn't the ip-filter policy the one that allows you to specify a list of allowed or denied IP addresses? That might be a better fit here.

upvoted 0 times

Shakira

28 days ago

I agree, ip-filter will help limit requests from specific IP addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

29 days ago

C) ip-fitter

upvoted 0 times

...

Maira

1 months ago

I think ip-filter is the best option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

1 months ago

D) rate-limit-by-key

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

1 months ago

C) ip-fitter

upvoted 0 times

...

Frankie

2 months ago

B) rate-limit

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

2 months ago

A) quota-by-key

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

3 months ago

I'm going with B. The rate-limit policy is designed to handle situations where you need to limit the number of requests, which is exactly what this question is asking for.

upvoted 0 times

Karl

2 months ago

I agree with you, D seems like the most appropriate choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

2 months ago

I think D is the best option. The rate-limit-by-key policy allows you to set limits based on a key, which would be useful for limiting requests from specific IP addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martin

2 months ago

I'm going with B. The rate-limit policy is designed to handle situations where you need to limit the number of requests, which is exactly what this question is asking for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. The rate-limit policy might work as well, since it can limit the overall number of requests to the backend database.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

3 months ago

I think the answer is D. The rate-limit-by-key policy allows you to limit the number of requests from a specific IP address, which seems to be the requirement here.

upvoted 0 times