Microsoft Exam AZ-204 Topic 17 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-204 exam

Question #: 86
Topic #: 17

You develop Azure Durable Functions to manage vehicle loans.

The loan process includes multiple actions that must be run in a specified order. One of the actions includes a customer credit check process, which may require multiple days to process.

You need to implement Azure Durable Functions for the loan process.

Which Azure Durable Functions type should you use?

Aorchestrator

Bclient

Cactivity

Dentity

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Olive at Jan 24, 2024, 07:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-204 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alberto

2 days ago

Yup, Orchestrator is the way to go. The credit check process is a good example of why you'd want to use Durable Functions - it allows you to handle those long-running tasks without the client having to wait around.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilda

3 days ago

Definitely Orchestrator. The client function is more for initiating the workflow, and the activity functions are the individual tasks that get executed. The entity function is used for managing state, which doesn't really fit this use case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helaine

4 days ago

I agree, the Orchestrator type seems like the way to go here. It'll allow us to define the overall workflow and handle the coordination of the different steps, including the long-running credit check process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgeanna

5 days ago

This question seems pretty straightforward. Based on the scenario, we're dealing with a multi-step process that needs to run in a specific order, and some of those steps may take a while to complete. That sounds like a perfect use case for the Orchestrator function type in Durable Functions.

upvoted 0 times

...