Microsoft AZ-204 Exam - Topic 17 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-204 exam

Question #: 49
Topic #: 17

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You are developing an Azure solution to collect point-of-sale (POS) device data from 2,000stores located throughout the world. A single device can produce 2megabytes (MB) of data every 24hours. Each store location has one to five devices that send data.

You must store the device data in Azure Blob storage. Device data must be correlated based on a device identifier. Additional stores are expected to open in the future.

You need to implement a solution to receive the device data.

Solution: Provision an Azure Event Grid. Configure the machine identifier as the partition key and enable capture.

Does the solution meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/event-grid/compare-messaging-services

by Francine at May 07, 2022, 06:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-204 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Tien

3 months ago

Not sure if partitioning by machine ID is enough for future growth.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elke

4 months ago

Yes, definitely meets the goal!

upvoted 0 times

...

Taryn

4 months ago

Wait, can Event Grid handle that much data?

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantay

4 months ago

I don't think Event Grid is the best fit here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

4 months ago

Sounds like a solid plan for data collection!

upvoted 0 times

...

My

4 months ago

This seems straightforward enough. Event Grid is the right choice for handling the incoming data, and using the machine identifier as the partition key makes sense for the correlation requirement. I'm confident this solution will meet the goals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefan

4 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the capture feature for Event Grid. Does that mean the data will be automatically stored in Blob storage, or is there more to the setup? I'll need to research that a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emerson

5 months ago

I think I've got a handle on this. Provisioning an Event Grid with the machine identifier as the partition key should work well for correlating the data and storing it in Blob storage. Feels like a solid solution to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. Event Grid seems like a good fit for handling the incoming device data, but I'm not sure if the partition key is the right approach. I'll need to double-check the documentation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and think through the different Azure services that could be used.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincenza

5 months ago

I think the partition key is important for organizing the data, but I'm not clear if Event Grid can actually store the data directly in Blob storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oretha

5 months ago

I feel like enabling capture might help with data correlation, but I'm not convinced that Event Grid can handle the volume from all those devices effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

5 months ago

I remember a practice question where we had to use Azure Blob storage for similar data collection. I think we might need something like Azure IoT Hub instead of Event Grid.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alica

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure if using Event Grid is the best approach for this scenario. I thought it was more for event-driven architectures rather than direct data ingestion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lasandra

5 months ago

This is a good test of our Wireshark knowledge. I feel pretty confident about using the tool, so I think I can work through this question and come up with the right command.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micah

5 months ago

This is a good question to test our knowledge of the IPsec framework. I'm confident I can identify the important protocols like AH, IP, ESP, and IKE. Time to put my studying to the test!

upvoted 0 times

...

Chun

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The exhibits don't seem to provide a lot of detail. I'll have to make an educated guess based on the information given.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fatima

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know routing protocols use different metrics, but I can't quite remember which one is used to select the best path when there are multiple options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Keena

5 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the definitions of each backlog to figure out the right relationship.

upvoted 0 times

...