New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-204 Exam - Topic 12 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-204 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 12
[All AZ-204 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You are developing an Azure Service application that processes queue data when it receives a message from a mobile application. Messages may not be sent to the service consistently.

You have the following requirements:

* Queue size must not grow larger than 80 gigabytes (GB).

* Use first-in-first-out (FIFO) ordering of messages.

* Minimize Azure costs.

You need to implement the messaging solution.

Solution: Use the .Net API to add a message to an Azure Service Bus Queue from the mobile application. Create an Azure Function App that uses an Azure Service Bus Queue trigger.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

You can create a function that is triggered when messages are submitted to an Azure Storage queue.


https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-create-storage-queue-triggered-function

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Hector
4 months ago
Not sure if the .Net API is the best choice for cost efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
4 months ago
Yes, this definitely meets the requirements!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
4 months ago
Wait, can Azure Functions handle that queue size?
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
5 months ago
I think it might get pricey with Azure Functions though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
5 months ago
Sounds like a solid plan for FIFO!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
5 months ago
I feel like there might be a better option for FIFO, maybe Azure Storage Queues? I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
5 months ago
I believe the solution is correct because using the .Net API with Azure Functions seems efficient, but I'm worried about the cost aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
5 months ago
I think this is similar to a practice question we did on message processing, but I can't recall if Azure Functions can guarantee FIFO ordering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure if using the Azure Service Bus Queue meets the FIFO requirement since I remember something about queues having potential delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
5 months ago
Ah, I recognize this! It's definitely the output of the traceroute tool. I've used it before to trace network connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the product owner wants frequent feature releases, so the project manager should facilitate that by focusing on the MVP, as option C suggests. That way, they can get the most valuable features out there quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
5 months ago
I remember something similar we did in class, and I think if the key is found, it should display the value, which might be 5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. Postal delivery, conferences, and meetings are all potential ways to collect email contacts, so the one that wouldn't be applicable is probably the website.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
5 months ago
I vaguely remember practicing a question about SSM where OSPF was involved, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel