Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam - Topic 4 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-140 exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-140 Questions]

You have an Azure subscription named Sub1 and a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription.

The tenant contains user accounts for all internal users and users from a partner company named Fabrikam, Inc. Each internal user is assigned a Microsoft 365 E5 license. The users at Fabrikam are not assigned any licenses.

Sub1 has an Azure Virtual Desktop deployment that contains a host pool named Pool1. Pool1 contains a RemoteApp named Appl.

You need to configure access to App1. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* The Fabrikam users must be licensed by using Per-user access pricing.

* App1 must be accessible to all the internal and Fabrikam users.

* Costs must be minimized.

What should you do first?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Eugene at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-140 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jess
18 days ago
But D doesn't address licensing. We need to minimize costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
23 days ago
I prefer D. It directly gives access to App1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
29 days ago
It licenses Fabrikam users properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
1 month ago
Why B? Isn't it costly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
1 month ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
1 month ago
A new host pool? That seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
2 months ago
Adding them to the app group sounds like a good start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
2 months ago
I’m not sure if they need a license at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
2 months ago
Definitely B, makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
2 months ago
You need to assign licenses for Fabrikam users first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
2 months ago
I'm going with D. Keeping it simple and cost-effective is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
3 months ago
Haha, imagine if they just said "Assign a Microsoft 365 license to each Fabrikam user." That would be too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
3 months ago
D is the obvious choice here. Why complicate things when you can just add the Fabrikam users to the app group?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Wouldn't adding a new host pool be a bit overkill?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
4 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Gotta keep those Fabrikam folks licensed up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the licensing part. Do we really need to assign a license before they can access App1?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
4 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where we had to manage user access in Azure. I feel like adding them to the application group might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
4 months ago
I remember something about adding users to application groups in Azure, but I can't recall if that's the first step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
4 months ago
I think we need to assign licenses to the Fabrikam users, but I'm not sure if the F3 license is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to use the per-user access pricing for the Fabrikam users, which means we don't need to assign them any licenses. So option D seems like the way to go - add them to the application group and they'll be able to access App1 without any additional costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option D and adding the Fabrikam users to the application group for App1. That way, we can avoid the extra licensing costs and still give them access. But I'll need to make sure that's allowed under the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the licensing requirements here. It seems like we need to give the Fabrikam users access, but they can't be assigned the same E5 licenses as the internal users. I'm not sure if the F3 license is the right approach, so I might need to double-check the licensing details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
5 months ago
I think the key here is to minimize costs while still giving the Fabrikam users access to App1. Adding a new host pool seems like overkill, so I'd probably go with option B and assign the Fabrikam users a Microsoft 365 F3 license.
upvoted 0 times
Marica
13 days ago
I agree, option B seems the most cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel