Microsoft AZ-140 Exam - Topic 2 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-140 exam

Question #: 91
Topic #: 2

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure Virtual Desktop deployment

You need to ensure that users are signed out automatically when they disconnect from a session.

Solution: From the Local Group Policy Editor, you configure the Connections settings.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Lynelle at Mar 05, 2025, 10:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-140 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Belen

7 months ago

Totally agree, this is the right approach!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nichelle

7 months ago

Wait, can you really do that through Group Policy?

upvoted 0 times

...

Glen

7 months ago

Pretty sure that's how you set it up!

upvoted 0 times

...

Brendan

8 months ago

I think it might not work as expected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

8 months ago

Yes, that definitely meets the goal!

upvoted 0 times

...

Catalina

8 months ago

I feel like I’ve seen similar scenarios where the answer was "No" because the Group Policy doesn’t enforce sign-out on disconnects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willis

8 months ago

I’m a bit confused. I thought the Group Policy settings could control session behaviors, but I can't recall if it applies to disconnections specifically.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tanja

8 months ago

I remember a practice question where we had to manage session timeouts, and I feel like this is somewhat related. I might lean towards "No" on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

8 months ago

I think configuring the Local Group Policy Editor might help, but I'm not entirely sure if it specifically addresses automatic sign-out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reed

8 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions that the solution might not be the only correct answer, so I want to make sure I'm not missing something. I'll need to review the Azure Virtual Desktop documentation carefully before selecting my answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

8 months ago

This seems straightforward enough. Configuring the Connections settings in the Local Group Policy Editor is a pretty standard way to handle this kind of requirement. I'm confident that this solution will meet the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavelle

8 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about an Azure Virtual Desktop deployment, so I should focus on Azure-specific settings and configurations. Configuring the Local Group Policy Editor might work, but I'll need to double-check the documentation to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Configuring the Local Group Policy Editor feels a bit too specific. I wonder if there might be a more general or Azure-focused solution that could work as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ena

9 months ago

I think this is a straightforward question. Configuring the Connections settings in the Local Group Policy Editor seems like a logical way to ensure users are signed out automatically when they disconnect from a session.

upvoted 0 times

...

Britt

1 year ago

I hear the Local Group Policy Editor is the secret to unlocking the true power of Azure Virtual Desktop. It's like a hidden treasure map, but instead of X marking the spot, it's a bunch of obscure settings that only the most seasoned IT pros know about.

upvoted 0 times

Justine

1 year ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenny

1 year ago

B) No

upvoted 0 times

...

Nichelle

1 year ago

A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

1 year ago

This solution sounds like it might involve a bit of manual configuration. I prefer my Azure solutions to be more 'set it and forget it'. Maybe there's a more automated way to handle this that doesn't require diving into the Local Group Policy Editor.

upvoted 0 times

Orville

1 year ago

Thaddeus: Maybe we can explore other options before diving into the Local Group Policy Editor.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raymon

1 year ago

User 3: Yes, there should be a simpler solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thaddeus

1 year ago

User 2: I think there might be a more automated way to handle this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frederica

1 year ago

User 1: I agree, manual configuration can be a hassle.

upvoted 0 times

...

Angelyn

1 year ago

Ah, the old 'Local Group Policy Editor' trick! That's a classic. I wonder if it'll work as well as it did back in the good old days of on-premises desktop management. Either way, it's worth a shot if you're feeling adventurous.

upvoted 0 times

Deja

1 year ago

User 2: Yeah, it's worth a shot. Can't hurt to test it out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anglea

1 year ago

User 1: I think it should work, let's give it a try.

upvoted 0 times

...

Solange

1 year ago

I'm not familiar with the Connections settings in the Local Group Policy Editor. Is this a standard configuration, or is it a custom setting that might not be widely known? I'd want to do some more research before selecting this option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winifred

1 year ago

No, I don't think that solution would work because it doesn't address the issue of automatically signing out users.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

1 year ago

This seems like a straightforward solution, but I'm not sure if it's the most efficient way to handle session disconnections. The Local Group Policy Editor is a powerful tool, but it might not be the best option for a large-scale Azure Virtual Desktop deployment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melodie

1 year ago

I'm not sure, I think we should explore other options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luann

1 year ago

Yes, that sounds like it would meet the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...