Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-140 Topic 2 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-140 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 2
[All AZ-140 Questions]

You have an Azure Virtual Desktop host pool that runs Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session. User sessions are load-balanced between the session hosts. Idle session timeout is 30 minutes. You plan to shut down a session host named Host1 to perform routine maintenance. You need to prevent new user sessions to Host1 without disconnecting active user sessions.

Solution: From the Azure portal, add lock on Host1. Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Kiley at Feb 09, 2025, 07:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-140 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Daniel
3 months ago
I'm with Aja on this one. The lock might stop new sessions, but the active ones could still get the boot. We need to find a way to let the users finish up their work before taking the host offline.
upvoted 0 times
Jenelle
3 months ago
User2: Agreed, we need to find a way to let the active sessions finish before shutting down the host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
3 months ago
User1: I think adding a lock might not be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jarod
3 months ago
I think the solution is correct because adding a lock on Host1 will effectively prevent new user sessions while allowing active ones to continue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
3 months ago
Haha, locking the host? That's like putting a padlock on your computer to stop people from using it. I think we need a more elegant solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
3 months ago
No, adding a lock on Host1 will not prevent new user sessions without disconnecting active ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
3 months ago
The lock should work to prevent new sessions, but I'm worried about the active sessions. Maybe we could try using the 'Drain' option to give users a chance to log off before shutting down the host.
upvoted 0 times
Kimberlie
3 months ago
User2: No, we should use the 'Drain' option to allow users to log off first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
3 months ago
User1: Yes, adding a lock should prevent new sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aja
4 months ago
Locking the host sounds like a good way to prevent new sessions, but I'm not sure it will keep the active sessions from being disconnected. We'll need to find a way to gracefully drain the sessions first.
upvoted 0 times
Dalene
2 months ago
User4: That sounds like a good idea, let's try setting Host1 to drain mode before shutting it down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
2 months ago
User3: Maybe we can set Host1 to drain mode to finish active sessions before maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
3 months ago
User2: I agree, we need to find a way to gracefully drain the active sessions before shutting down Host1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
3 months ago
User1: I think adding a lock on Host1 will prevent new sessions, but what about the active ones?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jarod
4 months ago
Yes, adding a lock on Host1 will prevent new user sessions without disconnecting active ones.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel