MENU
You have an Azure Virtual Desktop deployment.
You plan to use just-in-time (JIT) VM access to manage session host virtual machines.
You need to recommend license requirements for JIT VM access. Your solution must minimize costs.
Which license should you recommend?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium AZ-140 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
BE
Bettina
11 months ago
I’ve heard mixed reviews about Plan 2 being necessary for JIT.
JA
Jamal
11 months ago
Microsoft 365 E5 might be overkill, but it has great features.
JO
Josue
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure Plan 1 is enough for all security needs?
GE
German
12 months ago
Definitely agree with that! Plan 1 covers JIT access.
AD
Adolph
12 months ago
I think Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1 is the way to go for cost efficiency.
AM
Amie
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 2, but I recall it being more expensive. Is there a cheaper option that still meets the requirements?
KA
Karol
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question about licensing for Azure services, and I feel like Microsoft 365 E5 could be overkill for just-in-time access.
CA
Callie
1 year ago
I think Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1 might be the right choice since it covers basic security features, but I need to double-check the specifics.
GE
Georgiann
1 year ago
I remember JIT VM access is part of Azure Security, but I'm not sure which license is the most cost-effective.
TA
Talia
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1 is the way to go here. It should provide the necessary JIT VM access functionality at the lowest cost.
MA
Maynard
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which license would be the most cost-effective while still meeting the requirements. I might need to do some more research on the features and pricing of each option.
PE
Pete
1 year ago
Based on the question, it seems like we need a license that specifically supports just-in-time VM access. I'm wondering if Enterprise Mobility + Security E5 might be the best fit since it includes Azure AD Premium.
BR
Brice
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between the license options. Does Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 2 offer any additional features that would justify the higher cost?
CH
Christiane
1 year ago
I think the key here is to minimize costs, so I'd lean towards the cheaper option of Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1.
HO
Hortencia
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option B with the download link might be better - that way the director can access the report whenever they need it, instead of just getting the file emailed to them. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
LO
Lovetta
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The "no bgp default route-target filter" command means that prefixes with any route targets will be accepted, even if they aren't explicitly imported at the PE router. So option A is the correct answer here.
JA
Jamal
1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. Business value and customer satisfaction seem like the most important measures of IT governance effectiveness.
DU
Dulce
1 year ago
I recall discussing how the CMDB is all about relationships, especially in understanding dependencies. Is that what we're looking for?
TE
Terina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to make sure I fully understand what each action (unbind, delete, suspend) means and how it affects the different resources.
JU
Jutta
2 years ago
Hold on, did someone say 'just-in-time'? I'm more of a 'just-in-case' kind of guy. But I guess C is the way to go.
KA
Kate
2 years ago
B. Microsoft 365 E5 is overkill for this scenario. We just need the JIT VM access functionality, not the entire Microsoft 365 suite.
HA
Hannah
2 years ago
D. Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1 would be my recommendation. It provides the necessary security features for JIT VM access without the extra bells and whistles of the other plans.
SU
Suzi
2 years ago
It's definitely the best choice to minimize costs while still ensuring security for the deployment.
SO
Solange
2 years ago
I agree, Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1 is the most cost-effective option for JIT VM access.
GE
Gearldine
2 years ago
I think Microsoft 365 E5 might be overkill for just managing session host virtual machines.
DE
Dean
2 years ago
Definitely, it provides the necessary security features without the extra costs of the other plans.
HE
Helaine
2 years ago
I agree, Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1 is the most cost-effective option for JIT VM access.
BR
Brittney
2 years ago
D. Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1 would be my recommendation. It provides the necessary security features for JIT VM access without the extra bells and whistles of the other plans.
SO
Solange
2 years ago
D) Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1
VI
Vicente
2 years ago
C) Enterprise Mobility + Security E5
IL
Ilona
2 years ago
B) Microsoft 365 E5
CA
Carey
2 years ago
D) Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1
AR
Aretha
2 years ago
A) Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 2
LU
Luisa
2 years ago
I agree, Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 1 is the most cost-effective option for JIT VM access.
DU
Dulce
2 years ago
C) Enterprise Mobility + Security E5
EL
Elza
2 years ago
A) Microsoft Defender for Servers Plan 2
NO
Novella
2 years ago
B) Microsoft 365 E5
AD
Adell
2 years ago
I think the answer is C. Enterprise Mobility + Security E5 seems like the most comprehensive and cost-effective option for managing JIT VM access.
LE
Lenna
2 years ago
I think B) Microsoft 365 E5 could also be a good option for license requirements.
LO
Lou
2 years ago
I agree, C) Enterprise Mobility + Security E5 is the best choice for managing JIT VM access.