Microsoft AZ-140 Exam - Topic 10 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-140 exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 10

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an Azure Virtual Desktop host pool that runs Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session.

User sessions are load-balanced between the session hosts. Idle session timeout is 30 minutes.

You plan to shut down a session host named Host1 to perform routine maintenance.

You need to prevent new user sessions to Host1 without disconnecting active user sessions.

Solution: From the host pool, you remove Host1 from the session host list.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-desktop/drain-mode

by Bulah at May 07, 2022, 01:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-140 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Larae

10 months ago

Just removing it from the list seems like a solid plan!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rose

10 months ago

Sounds right, but I’m not sure if it’s the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harris

11 months ago

Wait, does that mean active sessions get kicked off too?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

11 months ago

I disagree, that might disconnect active users.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julio

11 months ago

Removing Host1 will definitely stop new sessions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronika

11 months ago

I believe there's a setting to drain the host instead of removing it, but I can't recall if that's the right approach for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I thought that just removing a host would mean users can't connect to it anymore, which could lead to issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martina

11 months ago

I remember a similar practice question where we had to manage session hosts, and I feel like there was a different way to prevent new sessions without affecting the current ones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

11 months ago

I think removing Host1 from the session host list might actually disconnect the active sessions, which isn't what we want.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorathy

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. Telnet seems like it might work, but I'm not sure if it's secure enough for the requirements. I'll have to review the details more closely.

upvoted 0 times

...

Van

11 months ago

I'm confident the output will be in the Comma12.2 format, so I'll select option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorinda

11 months ago

If I remember right, the Service Perimeter Guard is definitely used to mitigate risks, so I'm leaning towards true, but I might need to double-check the definitions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dusti

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the difference between parallel and rolling upgrades. I'll need to make sure I understand that before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...