Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-120 Exam - Topic 5 Question 19 Discussion

Posted by Felix on May 04, 2022 at 05:54 AM

You are deploying SAP Fiori lo an SAP environment on Azure.

You are configuring SAML 2.0 for an SAP Fiori instance named FPP that uses client 100 to authenticate to an Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) tenant.

Which provider name should you use to ensure that the Azure AD tenant recognizes the SAP fiori instance?

Get Premium AZ-120 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
RO
Royce 12 months ago
Wait, why are we using https instead of ldap? Seems off.
JA
Jacquelyne 1 year ago
I’ve always used https://FPP100 for these setups.
JA
James 1 year ago
Not so sure about that, could it be ldap://FPP-100 instead?
SH
Shaun 1 year ago
Definitely agree with that!
SK
Skye 1 year ago
I think the provider name should be https://FPP.
MI
Mi 1 year ago
I recall that "https://FPP" was mentioned in our study materials as a common format for Azure AD, but I can't remember if the client number changes that.
DE
Derick 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the client number in the provider name. Should it be included in the URL, or is it just "FPP"?
SO
Sol 1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where the provider name was crucial for recognition by Azure AD. I feel like "https" is the right choice here.
MA
Mary 1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using the correct URL format for Azure AD integration, but I'm not entirely sure if it should include "https" or "ldap."
CA
Carmela 1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The GDPR is all about protecting personal data, and in this case, the tax advisor needs to process the data to fulfill their legal requirements. I'm going with B.
TH
Theron 1 year ago
Offloading the SSL decrypt to a higher capacity firewall - that's a clever idea. I'll make sure to explain that approach clearly in my response.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel