New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AZ-120 Exam - Topic 4 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-120 exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-120 Questions]

You have an Azure subscription.

Your company has an SAP environment that runs on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) servers and SAP

HANA. The environment has a primary site and a disaster recovery site. Disaster recovery is based on SAP

HANA system replication. The SAP ERP environment is 4 TB and has a projected growth of 5% per month.

The company has an uptime Service Level Agreement (SLA) of 99.99%, a maximum recovery time objective

(RTO) of four hours, and a recovery point objective (RPO) of 10 minutes.

You plan to migrate to Azure.

You need to design an SAP landscape for the company.

Which options meet the company's requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Refugia
3 months ago
Wait, can SAP HANA really handle that much growth on Azure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
3 months ago
D sounds complicated, not sure if it's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
3 months ago
C might not meet the SLA requirements though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
4 months ago
I think B is better with the Availability Zone setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
4 months ago
Option A seems solid for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
4 months ago
I have a vague memory of clustering with Pacemaker, but I'm not confident about the Azure fence agent. I think option D might be a good fit, but I need to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I recall that SAP HANA system replication is crucial for disaster recovery. I feel like options A and C could work, but I'm leaning towards A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think using Azure Availability Zones could help with the SLA. Maybe option B is the best choice since it mentions that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of high availability for SAP HANA, especially with the RTO and RPO requirements. I think options A and B might be strong candidates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
5 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different Azure options presented here. I want to make sure I fully understand the differences between things like Availability Sets, Availability Zones, and Large Instances before selecting an answer. I may need to ask the instructor for some clarification on the specific Azure services and how they relate to the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Based on the requirements, I think option B is the way to go. Using ASCS/ERS and SLES clustering with the Pacemaker fence agent, along with SAP application servers in an Availability Zone and SAP HANA on Azure Large Instances with system replication, should provide the high availability and disaster recovery capabilities the company needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a lot of details to keep track of, and I want to make sure I fully understand the requirements before selecting an answer. I may need to review some Azure documentation to refresh my memory on the different high availability and disaster recovery options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty complex question, but I think I can tackle it. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around uptime, RTO, and RPO, and then evaluate the different Azure options to see which one best meets those needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
10 months ago
Alright, time to put on my thinking cap. This is the kind of question that separates the Azure ninjas from the Azure apprentices. I'm gonna go with option B, but I better double-check those recovery time and point objectives. Wouldn't want to end up in the Azure doghouse!
upvoted 0 times
Graciela
8 months ago
User3: Definitely, let's double-check everything before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
8 months ago
User2: Agreed, we need to make sure we meet those recovery time and point objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
9 months ago
User1: Option B seems like the way to go. High availability and disaster recovery are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nathalie
10 months ago
This is the kind of question that keeps me up at night. All these Azure and HANA terms are making my head spin, but I reckon option B is the safest bet. Gotta love that Pacemaker and availability zone action!
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
8 months ago
Definitely, option B covers all the bases for our SAP landscape design on Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
9 months ago
Yeah, option B provides clustering and high availability with the Pacemaker fence agent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
9 months ago
Definitely, option B provides the necessary high availability and disaster recovery features for the SAP landscape.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
10 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most reliable choice with the Pacemaker and availability zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
10 months ago
Yeah, the Pacemaker fence agent and Azure Availability Zone for SAP application servers sound like a solid combination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
10 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most reliable choice with the Pacemaker and availability zone setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheron
10 months ago
Ah, the good old Azure and HANA dance. I've got to say, these questions are always a bit of a headache, but I think option D is the way to go. Azure fence agent and availability sets sound like the way to meet those uptime and recovery requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. All the options seem to involve Azure and HANA, but I'm not confident which one is the best fit. Guess I'll have to study up on Azure and HANA a bit more before the exam.
upvoted 0 times
Maryrose
8 months ago
Let's focus on studying Option A more to ensure we understand the implementation details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
9 months ago
Yeah, Option A provides high availability and disaster recovery which aligns with our SLA and objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
9 months ago
I agree, Azure virtual machines and SLES for SAP application servers with SAP HANA on Azure using system replication sounds solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
10 months ago
Option A seems to be the best fit for our company's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willow
11 months ago
I'm not sure about option A. I think option C might be better with SAP application instances deployed to an Azure Availability Set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
11 months ago
I agree with Arlen. Option A seems like a good choice for the SAP landscape design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
11 months ago
The question seems pretty straightforward. I think option B is the correct answer since it mentions the use of Pacemaker, availability zones, and HANA system replication, which meet the company's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Flo
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B as well, it seems to have the most comprehensive solution for the company's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
9 months ago
Option C might be a good choice too with SAP application instances deployed to an Azure Availability Set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
10 months ago
I think option A could also work with Azure virtual machines and SLES for SAP application servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
10 months ago
I agree, option B seems to cover all the necessary components for the SAP landscape.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlen
11 months ago
I think option A could meet the company's requirements because it includes Azure virtual machines and SAP HANA on Azure for high availability and disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel