Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-120 Exam - Topic 13 Question 47 Discussion

You are planning a highly available SAP HANA deployment on Azure virtual machines.You need to recommend a solution for monitoring TCP latency between the SAP application and the database tiers on the TCP socket layer.What should you include in the recommendation?
A) the Azure Network Watcher reachability report
B) Azure Extension for SAP
C) the NIPING command
D) the PING command

Microsoft AZ-120 Exam - Topic 13 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-120 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 13
[All AZ-120 Questions]

You are planning a highly available SAP HANA deployment on Azure virtual machines.

You need to recommend a solution for monitoring TCP latency between the SAP application and the database tiers on the TCP socket layer.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Ruthann at May 04, 2022, 06:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-120 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Louvenia
7 months ago
I’m surprised NIPING is still relevant, thought it was outdated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
7 months ago
PING command? That's too basic for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
7 months ago
Wait, isn't the Azure Network Watcher more comprehensive?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
7 months ago
Totally agree, NIPING is specifically designed for that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
7 months ago
I think the NIPING command is the best choice for TCP latency monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
7 months ago
The PING command seems too basic for what we need here; I feel like we should be looking for something more specialized for TCP latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between different monitoring tools, and I feel like the Azure Extension for SAP might be useful, but I’m not confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
8 months ago
I think the NIPING command could be relevant here since it’s designed for network performance testing, but I need to double-check its application in SAP environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
8 months ago
I remember studying about Azure Network Watcher, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best option for monitoring TCP latency specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
8 months ago
Document feeders seem like a good option, as they make it easier for people with dexterity issues to use printers and copiers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the differences between them. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
8 months ago
I think this question is pretty straightforward. The key is to determine the appropriate deployment scenario based on the number of nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
8 months ago
I'm kind of confused about the role of the "Reporter." Could they really access only their own complaints with option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused. I remember studying the different aspects of service context, but I'm not sure if it really affects implementation environments.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel