Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-120 Exam - Topic 11 Question 102 Discussion

You have an SAP HANA on Azure (Large Instances) deployment that has two Type II SKU nodes. Each node is provisioned in a separate Azure region. You need to monitor storage replication for the deployment. What should you use?
A) xfsdump
B) azacsnap
C) rear
D) tar

Microsoft AZ-120 Exam - Topic 11 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-120 exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 11
[All AZ-120 Questions]

You have an SAP HANA on Azure (Large Instances) deployment that has two Type II SKU nodes. Each node is provisioned in a separate Azure region. You need to monitor storage replication for the deployment. What should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lashawnda at Sep 13, 2024, 11:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-120 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Olive
10 months ago
Wait, are we really using tar for storage replication? That seems off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
10 months ago
I thought xfsdump was the go-to for this kind of task?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
10 months ago
Not so sure about that, rear might be a better fit for backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
10 months ago
Totally agree, azacsnap is designed for Azure environments!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
10 months ago
I think azacsnap is the right choice for monitoring storage replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards xfsdump, but I recall it being more about file systems than replication. This is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
11 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to choose between different backup tools. I wonder if rear could be relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
11 months ago
I think azacsnap might be the right choice since it’s related to Azure storage, but I’m a bit uncertain about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
11 months ago
I remember we discussed storage replication in class, but I’m not sure which tool specifically applies to Azure HANA deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the other options. Can you explain why xfsdump, rear, and tar wouldn't be the right choices here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
11 months ago
I agree, azacsnap sounds like the most relevant tool for this scenario. I'm confident that's the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
11 months ago
Based on the context, I think azacsnap is the best choice here. It's specifically designed for monitoring storage replication in Azure environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
11 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. We need to monitor storage replication for an SAP HANA on Azure deployment with two Type II SKU nodes in separate regions. The options given are xfsdump, azacsnap, rear, and tar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know management representations are important, but I'm not totally clear on the specifics here. I'll have to re-read the question and options closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
2 years ago
Who needs xfsdump or tar when you've got azacsnap? It's like the Batman of storage monitoring tools.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 years ago
B) azacsnap is the way to go. I heard it can even make you a sandwich while it's replicating your data.
upvoted 0 times
Joana
2 years ago
User 3: I agree, azacsnap seems like the best option for our deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, I heard it's really efficient and reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
2 years ago
I think we should use azacsnap for monitoring storage replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yong
2 years ago
Definitely going with azacsnap on this one. It's like the Swiss Army Knife of storage replication tools.
upvoted 0 times
Reuben
2 years ago
azacsnap seems like the most efficient option for monitoring storage replication in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
2 years ago
I've heard great things about azacsnap, it's definitely a reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
2 years ago
I agree, azacsnap is the way to go for monitoring storage replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cornell
2 years ago
I'm not sure about azacsnap, I think we should consider using xfsdump instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
2 years ago
I agree with Barbra, azacsnap seems like the right choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
2 years ago
azacsnap sounds like the perfect tool for this job. I bet it can even do some fancy dance moves while it's at it!
upvoted 0 times
Rima
2 years ago
Denae: Let's go with azacsnap then, it sounds like the perfect tool for the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
2 years ago
I've heard good things about azacsnap, let's give it a try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
2 years ago
I agree, azacsnap seems like the best option for our SAP HANA deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
2 years ago
I think azacsnap is the way to go for monitoring storage replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barbra
2 years ago
I think we should use azacsnap for monitoring storage replication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel