New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AI-900 Exam - Topic 7 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AI-900 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 7
[All AI-900 Questions]

You are building a Language Understanding model for an e-commerce business.

You need to ensure that the model detects when utterances are outside the intended scope of the model.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

TheNoneintent is filled with utterances that are outside of your domain.


https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/LUIS/luis-concept-intent

Topic 5, Describe features of conversational AI workloads on Azure

by Eden at May 05, 2022, 12:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AI-900 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Annalee
4 months ago
Totally with A, you need fresh data to see how it performs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
4 months ago
Wait, create a new model? That sounds drastic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
4 months ago
C seems a bit off, not sure how that helps with scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
4 months ago
I think B makes sense too, gotta handle those out-of-scope utterances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
5 months ago
Definitely A, testing is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
5 months ago
I vaguely recall that creating a new model might be overkill for this situation. I think we should focus on refining the existing one instead. So, probably not option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think testing with new utterances is crucial for evaluating the model's performance. Could that be option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamar
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having a "None" intent to capture out-of-scope utterances. That might be option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
5 months ago
I feel like creating a prebuilt task entity could help, but I’m not confident it directly addresses out-of-scope detection. Maybe option C isn’t the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Does "a single interface for all of its operations" mean it uses one interface for everything, or that it has multiple interfaces that all work the same way? I'll have to re-read it a few times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
5 months ago
Yeah, I agree with Emily. Option D looks like the cleanest and most straightforward solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure integration testing has to do with checking that different components work together correctly. I think option A or D might be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel