Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AI-102 Topic 5 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AI-102 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 5
[All AI-102 Questions]

You train a Conversational Language Understanding model to understand the natural language input of users.

You need to evaluate the accuracy of the model before deploying it.

What are two methods you can use? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Cristal at Jul 09, 2024, 09:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AI-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marion
1 months ago
Whoa, options A and D sound like they're straight out of a cyberpunk novel. I'll just stick to the user-friendly options B and C and leave the portal diving to the IT folks. Although, I do wonder if the model will understand my memes. Gotta keep it professional, I suppose.
upvoted 0 times
Jess
9 days ago
User 1: I agree, options A and D sound intense. I'll go with B and C too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenora
1 months ago
I'm all about efficiency, so option B is my pick. Active Learning and utterance validation in one place? Sign me up! Although, I do wonder if the model will understand my jokes during the testing process. Guess we'll find out.
upvoted 0 times
Tonja
13 days ago
User 3: Let's hope the model can handle some humor!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
22 days ago
User 2: User jokes might confuse the model during testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
28 days ago
User 1: Option B sounds good. Active Learning and utterance validation in one place.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
1 months ago
Option D is interesting, but do I really want to be dealing with Log Analytics and all that? I'd rather keep it simple and stick to the Language Studio tools. Maybe I'll just go with option C and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about option A. Retrieving the model evaluation summary from a REST endpoint sounds a bit technical and not very user-friendly. I'd prefer something more visually intuitive, like option C in Language Studio.
upvoted 0 times
Annette
1 months ago
Option C in Language Studio is more visually intuitive and easier to understand for non-technical users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
1 months ago
Option A seems more technical, but it can provide detailed information about the model evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gayla
2 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Active Learning is a great way to validate the model's performance and get real-time feedback from users. Plus, it's right there in Language Studio - no need to dig through the Azure portal!
upvoted 0 times
Hubert
7 days ago
It's great that we have tools like Active Learning to ensure our model is accurate before deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
8 days ago
Using Active Learning in Language Studio makes the evaluation process more efficient and user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
1 months ago
I agree, it's important to continuously validate and improve the model's performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
1 months ago
Option B is definitely a good choice. Active Learning can help improve the model's accuracy over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adell
2 months ago
I prefer option B and option C. Active Learning in Language Studio can help improve the model's understanding, and selecting Model performance will give us a clear view of its accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
2 months ago
I agree with Winifred. Option A will give us a summary of the model evaluation, and option D will help us analyze the logs for further insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
2 months ago
I think we can use option A and option D to evaluate the accuracy of the model.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel