MENU
A manufacturing company wants to deploy an agent that will automate supplier invoice processing.
You are designing a solution to evaluate the financial implications of the deployment. The company is especially concerned about budget overruns.
You need to ensure that the solution considers the total cost of ownership (TCO), the expected savings from using automation, and whether to extend the existing Al capabilities.
What should you include in the design?
The question asks for a design element that evaluates:
total cost of ownership (TCO)
expected savings from automation
whether to extend existing AI capabilities
Those are classic investment-evaluation considerations, so the best answer is B. a return on AI investment (ROAI) analysis.
Why B is correct:
ROAI analysis compares the financial benefits of the AI solution against its full costs
It incorporates deployment cost, operating cost, maintenance, scaling, and savings from automation
It is the right framework when the company is specifically worried about budget overruns and wants a business case for expansion or extension
Why the other options are not sufficient:
A . adopting prebuilt agents to reduce deployment time may help cost indirectly, but it is not the financial evaluation framework being asked for
C . a break-even analysis only is too narrow because the requirement explicitly includes TCO, savings, and expansion decisions
D . training a custom model is an implementation choice, not the financial evaluation method
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!