Option E? Really? That's like saying 'applications that require a user to breathe air are only available as pre-compiled packages.' Shouldn't that be a given?
I'm going with option C as well. It just makes sense that building from source gives you more flexibility and customization options. Although, I do wonder if the exam writers are trying to trick us with that 'license' thing in option E.
Haha, option D is just ridiculous. Pre-compiled binaries offering more configuration than source-built apps? That's like saying a car with the hood welded shut has more engine options than one you can actually open up and tinker with.
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. I feel like option B might be the right one. Compiling from source can potentially make the application more secure, since you have more visibility and control over the code.
I think option C is the correct answer. Compiling from source gives you more control over the build process and configuration options that can't be changed later. The other options seem a bit off-base.
Peggie
1 months agoGolda
7 days agoDerrick
15 days agoTimothy
24 days agoDelisa
1 months agoStephanie
15 days agoLuis
21 days agoTonette
27 days agoJenise
2 months agoMarylou
1 days agoStevie
26 days agoFannie
2 months agoRory
2 months agoCaprice
1 months agoVincenza
1 months agoMoira
2 months agoVivienne
2 months agoFannie
2 months ago