New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

LPI 702-100 Exam - Topic 6 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 702-100 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 6
[All 702-100 Questions]

Which statement about the difference between compiling an application from source code and installing a pre-compiled binary is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Galen at Sep 11, 2024, 03:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 702-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alfreda
3 months ago
Wait, E seems off... I've seen licensed apps as source too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
3 months ago
C is spot on! You get to customize everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
3 months ago
B is interesting, but I’m not sure it’s always the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
4 months ago
Totally agree, A is definitely not true!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
4 months ago
Compiling from source can take a lot longer than just installing a binary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
4 months ago
I'm not sure about D; it seems counterintuitive that pre-compiled binaries would offer more configuration options. I might need to double-check that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
4 months ago
I think C could be right because when you compile from source, you can customize options that you can't change later. That seems to make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
4 months ago
I feel like I read somewhere that compiling from source can be more secure because you can review the code, which makes me lean towards B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
5 months ago
I remember discussing how compiling from source can take longer, especially if there are a lot of dependencies. So, I think A might be incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
5 months ago
This is a good question. I'll need to carefully consider the tradeoffs between the two approaches before selecting the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this. Compiling from source gives you more control, but pre-compiled binaries are usually faster to install.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on the key differences like speed, security, and customization options to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review the differences in security and configuration options between the two approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think through the differences between compiling from source and using a pre-compiled binary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
10 months ago
Option E? Really? That's like saying 'applications that require a user to breathe air are only available as pre-compiled packages.' Shouldn't that be a given?
upvoted 0 times
Golda
9 months ago
Agreed, it's a strange comparison to make.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
9 months ago
Yeah, it doesn't really make sense to say that about licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
9 months ago
I think option E is just stating the obvious.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delisa
10 months ago
I'm going with option C as well. It just makes sense that building from source gives you more flexibility and customization options. Although, I do wonder if the exam writers are trying to trick us with that 'license' thing in option E.
upvoted 0 times
Stephanie
9 months ago
Yeah, building from source definitely gives more control over the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
9 months ago
I think the exam writers might be trying to trick us with option E, it does seem a bit misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
9 months ago
I agree, option C does seem to offer more customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jenise
10 months ago
Haha, option D is just ridiculous. Pre-compiled binaries offering more configuration than source-built apps? That's like saying a car with the hood welded shut has more engine options than one you can actually open up and tinker with.
upvoted 0 times
Eden
8 months ago
Exactly, that's why compiling from source code can be more flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
8 months ago
Pre-compiled binaries can be limiting in terms of configuration options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
9 months ago
Yeah, it's important to be able to customize settings when building from source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
9 months ago
I agree, option D doesn't make sense. Source-built apps definitely offer more configuration possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
10 months ago
But compiling from source allows for more customization, so I still think it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. I feel like option B might be the right one. Compiling from source can potentially make the application more secure, since you have more visibility and control over the code.
upvoted 0 times
Caprice
10 months ago
But pre-compiled binaries can also be secure if they come from a trusted source.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
10 months ago
I think you might be right. Compiling from source does give you more control over the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Moira
10 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Compiling from source gives you more control over the build process and configuration options that can't be changed later. The other options seem a bit off-base.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
11 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel