Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

LPI Exam 701-100 Topic 3 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 701-100 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 3
[All 701-100 Questions]

A service should be provided to arbitrary clients on the Internet using HTTPS. Any standard client on the Internet should be able to consume the service without further configuration. Which of the following approaches can be used to implement these requirements? (Choose three correct answers.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Jovita at Sep 18, 2024, 06:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 701-100 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Hester
1 months ago
I'm cracking up at the idea of a web server without a certificate. That's like trying to secure your house with a screen door made of tissue paper.
upvoted 0 times
Gerri
21 days ago
User 3: E) Install a wildcard certificate and the respective private key on all the backend servers sounds like a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
1 months ago
User 2: Lisandra, that's definitely not a secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
1 months ago
User 1: A) Configure the web servers to not use a server certificate when serving HTTPS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
2 months ago
Wait, so you're telling me I can't just leave the web servers without a certificate? That seems like a lot of work!
upvoted 0 times
Eleonora
1 months ago
User 2: You could generate self-signed certificates during deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
1 months ago
User 1: No, you can't leave the web servers without a certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maile
2 months ago
I think Option E is the way to go. A wildcard certificate would make it easy to deploy new backend servers without having to worry about certificates.
upvoted 0 times
Jeanice
1 months ago
I agree, having a wildcard certificate would make managing certificates much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
1 months ago
Option E is definitely a good choice. It would simplify the deployment process for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edna
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option A though. Configuring web servers to not use a server certificate for HTTPS doesn't sound secure to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
2 months ago
Option D looks tempting, but I'm worried that decrypting the requests on the load balancer might introduce a security vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
2 months ago
I agree with Isadora. Option E also seems like a good approach as it allows for a wildcard certificate to be installed on all backend servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
2 months ago
Option B and C seem like the most secure options, but I'm not sure if a self-signed certificate would be accepted by all clients on the internet.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawn
14 days ago
Self-signed certificates may not be trusted by all clients, so using a certificate issuing service could be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
20 days ago
E) Install a wildcard certificate and the respective private key on all the backend servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
23 days ago
C) Use a certificate issuing service to request certificates during each server deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 months ago
B) Generate a self-signed certificates during the deployment of each backend server.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isadora
2 months ago
I think option C is a good choice because it ensures that certificates are requested during server deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel