Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

LPI 201-450 Exam - Topic 3 Question 120 Discussion

What is the minimum number of disks required in a fully redundant RAID5 array?
C) 3
A) 1
B) 2
D) 4
E) 5

LPI 201-450 Exam - Topic 3 Question 120 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 201-450 exam
Question #: 120
Topic #: 3
[All 201-450 Questions]

What is the minimum number of disks required in a fully redundant RAID5 array?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Hoa
28 days ago
Definitely C) 3. Anything less won't give full redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
1 month ago
I was torn between C) 3 and D) 4, but C feels right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 month ago
Yeah, C) 3 makes sense. One for data, two for parity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
1 month ago
I think it's C) 3. You need at least 3 disks for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
2 months ago
That's surprising, I didn't know it was that low!
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
2 months ago
Nope, definitely 3 disks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
Wait, I thought it was 4?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
2 months ago
Totally agree, 3 is the minimum!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
2 months ago
You need at least 3 disks for RAID5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I bet the answer is actually 6 disks. You can never have too much redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
3 months ago
Hmm, I thought RAID5 only needed 2 disks. This is trickier than I expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
3 months ago
E) 5 disks? That's way too many. The question clearly says "minimum".
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
4 months ago
D) 4 disks is the minimum for a fully redundant RAID5 array. I'm pretty sure about this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
4 months ago
C) 3 is the correct answer. RAID5 requires a minimum of 3 disks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
4 months ago
I remember reading that RAID5 can survive one disk failure, so it has to be at least 3 disks. I hope that's correct!
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
4 months ago
I thought it was 3 disks too, but I keep mixing it up with RAID10. This is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
4 months ago
I'm not too sure, but I feel like it might be 4 disks. I practiced a question like this before, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
4 months ago
I think RAID5 needs at least 3 disks, right? I remember something about needing one for parity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I know RAID5 needs multiple disks, but I can't remember the exact minimum. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
5 months ago
I've got this! The minimum number of disks for a fully redundant RAID5 array is 4. The parity data is distributed across all the disks, so you need at least 4 to have full redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Isn't RAID5 supposed to have at least 4 disks? I'm not sure about the minimum for full redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
5 months ago
Okay, RAID5 has parity data distributed across all the disks, so the minimum would be 3 disks, right? I'm pretty sure that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
5 months ago
Hmm, I think this is asking about the minimum number of disks needed for a RAID5 array to be fully redundant. Let me think this through...
upvoted 0 times
Isadora
23 days ago
I believe it's 3 disks for RAID5.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel