LPI 101-500 Exam - Topic 2 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 101-500 exam

Question #: 103
Topic #: 2

[All 101-500 Questions]

Consider the following output from the command ls --i:

How would a new file named c.txt be created with the same inode number as a.txt (Inode 525385)?

Aln --h a.txt c.txt

Bln c.txt a.txt

Cln a.txt c.txt

Dln --f c.txt a.txt

Eln --i 525385 c.txt

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Kassandra at Nov 19, 2024, 09:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 101-500 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Gene

9 months ago

Inodes are unique, but hard links share them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonida

9 months ago

I thought you couldn't just copy inode numbers like that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tresa

9 months ago

Wait, can you really create a file with the same inode like that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

10 months ago

Definitely option C! That's how you do it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantay

10 months ago

You can use `ln a.txt c.txt` to create a hard link.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

10 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the inode number part. I thought you just needed to link the file directly, so maybe option C is the answer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

10 months ago

I feel like the `--h` option is not correct for this. I might have seen something about just using `ln` without any flags for hard links.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

10 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question where we had to link files, and I think option C sounds right, but I could be mixing it up with another command.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

11 months ago

I think creating a hard link with the `ln` command is the way to go, but I'm not sure if it's `ln a.txt c.txt` or something else.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

11 months ago

Alright, I've got a strategy in mind. I'll try option C and see if that works. Gotta love these tricky Linux questions!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nikita

11 months ago

I think option E might be the right approach, but I'm not 100% sure. I'll make a note to research the "--i" flag for the "ln" command.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the question. Does the "ln" command work the way I think it does? I'll need to double-check the syntax.

upvoted 0 times

...

Victor

11 months ago

Okay, let me see if I can break this down step-by-step. The key seems to be creating a new file with the same inode number as a.txt.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonette

11 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latanya

2 years ago

Forget the inode, I'm just going to ln -s a.txt c.txt and call it a day. Symbolic links are where it's at, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

2 years ago

I'm going with C. It's the only option that actually mentions creating a file, and the inode number is just a red herring. Or maybe it's not... *scratches head*

upvoted 0 times

Kris

2 years ago

User1: Agreed, let's go with C then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Danica

2 years ago

User3: I'm not sure, but I think C is the safest option. Let's stick with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evan

2 years ago

User2: But what about ln --h a.txt c.txt? Could that work as well?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

2 years ago

User1: I think C is the right answer too. It makes sense to link a.txt to c.txt.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

2 years ago

Wait, wait, wait... did they seriously just ask us to create a file with the same inode number? What kind of sorcery is this?!

upvoted 0 times

Micaela

2 years ago

D) ln --h a.txt c.txt

upvoted 0 times

...

Bok

2 years ago

C) ln --i 525385 c.txt

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

2 years ago

B) ln c.txt a.txt

upvoted 0 times

...

Louann

2 years ago

A) ln a.txt c.txt

upvoted 0 times

...

Alfred

2 years ago

I'm not sure, but I think ln --i 525385 c.txt might also work

upvoted 0 times

...

My

2 years ago

I agree with Leandro, because ln a.txt c.txt creates a link with the same inode number

upvoted 0 times

...

Claribel

2 years ago

Oh, I got this! You gotta use the inode number, so E is the way to go. Ain't no way I'm messing this up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

2 years ago

Hmm, I'm pretty sure the answer is C. ln a.txt c.txt. That's how you create a hard link, right?

upvoted 0 times

Bernardo

2 years ago

Creating a hard link with ln a.txt c.txt will indeed give the new file the same inode number.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

2 years ago

I think you're right. ln a.txt c.txt should do the trick.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronna

2 years ago

Yes, you are correct. ln a.txt c.txt creates a hard link with the same inode number.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tora

2 years ago

Hold up, are we supposed to use the inode number or the file name? This is confusing, someone needs to clarify this.

upvoted 0 times

Olga

2 years ago

Actually, ln --h a.txt c.txt is the correct command to use.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesse

2 years ago

No, that's not right. We should use ln a.txt c.txt.

upvoted 0 times

...

Holley

2 years ago

That makes sense, let's go with that option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marva

2 years ago

Great, let's create the new file with the same inode number.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mauricio

2 years ago

Option E) ln --i 525385 c.txt is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anisha

2 years ago

So, we should use ln --i 525385 c.txt.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vi

2 years ago

Let's use the inode number to create the new file.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimbery

2 years ago

Let's use the inode number to create the new file.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leandro

2 years ago

I think the answer is C) ln a.txt c.txt

upvoted 0 times

...