Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Logical Operations Exam CFR-210 Topic 5 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Logical Operations's CFR-210 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 5
[All CFR-210 Questions]

A SOC analyst reviews vendor security bulletins and security blog articles against the company's deployed system and software base. Based on current attack patterns, three vulnerabilities, including a zero-day vulnerability, have been upgraded to high priority. Which of the following should the SOC analyst recommend? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lezlie at May 30, 2024, 12:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFR-210 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Corinne
3 months ago
Patch affected systems? Well, duh! That's the obvious choice. It's like trying to put out a fire with a water gun instead of a fire extinguisher.
upvoted 0 times
Shakira
1 months ago
C: Update IPS rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
2 months ago
B: Implement application whitelisting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
2 months ago
A: Patch affected systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melvin
3 months ago
Implement application whitelisting? Great idea, but it feels like trying to catch a fish with a net made of dental floss. Might as well put a band-aid on a paper cut.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
3 months ago
Update IPS rules? Now we're talking! That's a solid step towards protecting against those nasty vulnerabilities. I bet the SOC analyst is feeling pretty smart right about now.
upvoted 0 times
Harris
1 months ago
Implementing application whitelisting is another effective way to prevent unauthorized software from running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
1 months ago
Rebooting affected servers could also help in mitigating the vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
2 months ago
I agree, it's a proactive measure to enhance our security posture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
2 months ago
Yes, updating IPS rules is crucial for staying ahead of potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krissy
3 months ago
DNS filtering? Hmm, seems like a good idea, but it doesn't really address the core issue of the vulnerabilities. Might as well use a band-aid on a broken leg.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
3 months ago
I think implementing application whitelisting could also be beneficial to prevent unauthorized software from running.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
3 months ago
Rebooting servers? That's like trying to fix a leaky faucet by turning off the water supply. Not very practical for a zero-day vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
Kenia
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
We should focus on updating IPS rules and patching affected systems to address the vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
3 months ago
Agreed, rebooting servers may not be the most effective solution for a zero-day vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melita
3 months ago
I agree with Junita, those are the most important steps to take in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
3 months ago
We should definitely update IPS rules and patch affected systems.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel