Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Linux Foundation PCA Exam - Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

Posted by Lavonna on May 12, 2026 at 10:44 AM

What Prometheus component would you use if targets are running behind a Firewall/NAT?

Suggested Answer: D

When Prometheus targets are behind firewalls or NAT and cannot be reached directly by the Prometheus server's pull mechanism, the recommended component to use is PushProx.

PushProx works by reversing the usual pull model. It consists of a PushProx Proxy (accessible by Prometheus) and PushProx Clients (running alongside the targets). The clients establish outbound connections to the proxy, which allows Prometheus to ''pull'' metrics indirectly. This approach bypasses network restrictions without compromising the Prometheus data model.

Unlike the Pushgateway (which is used for short-lived batch jobs, not network-isolated targets), PushProx maintains the Prometheus ''pull'' semantics while accommodating environments where direct scraping is impossible.


Verified from Prometheus documentation and official PushProx design notes -- Monitoring Behind NAT/Firewall, PushProx Overview, and Architecture and Usage Scenarios sections.

Get Premium PCA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
YV
Yvonne 18 hours ago
I think it's Pull Proxy.
EM
Emelda 6 days ago
PushProx is good for pushing metrics, but not sure here.
BE
Belen 11 days ago
PushProx is for pushing metrics, not pulling.
LA
Lavelle 16 days ago
I lean towards Pull Proxy for NAT issues.
YO
Yolande 21 days ago
HA Proxy is for load balancing, not this.
TH
Thaddeus 27 days ago
HA Proxy is more for load balancing, right?
KA
Kami 1 month ago
No, I feel Pull Proxy is more suitable.
BU
Buffy 1 month ago
What about PushProx? Seems useful.
KR
Krystina 1 month ago
What about Pull Gateway? It could work too.
PA
Paz 2 months ago
I feel Pull Gateway could work too.
NE
Nelida 2 months ago
I agree, Pull Proxy makes sense for NAT.
LO
Lottie 2 months ago
I think it's Pull Proxy.
CH
Chauncey 2 months ago
I think it's Pull Proxy.
WE
Wenona 2 months ago
Surprised that people don't know about Pull Gateway!
TR
Tricia 2 months ago
Wait, is D) PushProx even a real thing?
FA
Fannie 3 months ago
I agree with B) Pull Gateway, seems right!
CH
Charlene 3 months ago
I thought it was A) Pull Proxy?
AL
Alpha 3 months ago
Definitely B) Pull Gateway for that situation.
CH
Chandra 3 months ago
Surprised people still confuse these options!
SV
Svetlana 3 months ago
Wait, is PushProx even a real thing?
CA
Cathrine 3 months ago
I agree with Pull Gateway, makes sense for NAT!
VE
Veronika 4 months ago
I thought A) Pull Proxy was the way to go?
CH
Chu 4 months ago
Definitely B) Pull Gateway for that situation.
ST
Stanton 4 months ago
I thought HA Proxy was more about load balancing, so I'm leaning towards the Pull Gateway, but I need to double-check.
GO
Golda 4 months ago
I feel like the PushProx might be the right answer, but I can't recall the details about how it works with NAT.
LA
Lashandra 4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about Prometheus components, and I think the Pull Proxy was mentioned in that context.
LO
Lorean 6 months ago
I think it's either the Pull Gateway or the Pull Proxy, but I'm not entirely sure which one is specifically for Firewall/NAT situations.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel