Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Linux Foundation PCA Exam - Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

What Prometheus component would you use if targets are running behind a Firewall/NAT?
D) PushProx
A) Pull Proxy
B) Pull Gateway
C) HA Proxy

Linux Foundation PCA Exam - Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Linux Foundation's PCA exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 4
[All PCA Questions]

What Prometheus component would you use if targets are running behind a Firewall/NAT?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

When Prometheus targets are behind firewalls or NAT and cannot be reached directly by the Prometheus server's pull mechanism, the recommended component to use is PushProx.

PushProx works by reversing the usual pull model. It consists of a PushProx Proxy (accessible by Prometheus) and PushProx Clients (running alongside the targets). The clients establish outbound connections to the proxy, which allows Prometheus to ''pull'' metrics indirectly. This approach bypasses network restrictions without compromising the Prometheus data model.

Unlike the Pushgateway (which is used for short-lived batch jobs, not network-isolated targets), PushProx maintains the Prometheus ''pull'' semantics while accommodating environments where direct scraping is impossible.


Verified from Prometheus documentation and official PushProx design notes -- Monitoring Behind NAT/Firewall, PushProx Overview, and Architecture and Usage Scenarios sections.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Paz
1 day ago
I feel Pull Gateway could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
6 days ago
I agree, Pull Proxy makes sense for NAT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
11 days ago
I think it's Pull Proxy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
17 days ago
I think it's Pull Proxy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
22 days ago
Surprised that people don't know about Pull Gateway!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
27 days ago
Wait, is D) PushProx even a real thing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
1 month ago
I agree with B) Pull Gateway, seems right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
1 month ago
I thought it was A) Pull Proxy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 month ago
Definitely B) Pull Gateway for that situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 months ago
Surprised people still confuse these options!
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
2 months ago
Wait, is PushProx even a real thing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
2 months ago
I agree with Pull Gateway, makes sense for NAT!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
2 months ago
I thought A) Pull Proxy was the way to go?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
2 months ago
Definitely B) Pull Gateway for that situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
2 months ago
I thought HA Proxy was more about load balancing, so I'm leaning towards the Pull Gateway, but I need to double-check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
3 months ago
I feel like the PushProx might be the right answer, but I can't recall the details about how it works with NAT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
3 months ago
I remember practicing a question about Prometheus components, and I think the Pull Proxy was mentioned in that context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
4 months ago
I think it's either the Pull Gateway or the Pull Proxy, but I'm not entirely sure which one is specifically for Firewall/NAT situations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel