Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Linux Foundation LFCS Exam - Topic 4 Question 27 Discussion

What argument to the -type option of find will match files that are symbolic links? (Specify only the argument and no other options or words.)
A) l

Linux Foundation LFCS Exam - Topic 4 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Linux Foundation's LFCS exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 4
[All LFCS Questions]

What argument to the -type option of find will match files that are symbolic links? (Specify only the argument and no other options or words.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by An at May 09, 2022, 07:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium LFCS Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nakita
9 months ago
I thought it was -type s for symlinks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
9 months ago
Yup, -type l is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
10 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought it was something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
10 months ago
Totally agree, it's definitely -type l.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
10 months ago
It's -type l.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
10 months ago
I had a similar question in practice, and I think it was "l" for symbolic links, but I hope I got it right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
10 months ago
Was it "L" or "l"? I can't recall if it was case-sensitive or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
10 months ago
I remember practicing with the find command, and I feel like "l" was definitely mentioned for links.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
10 months ago
I think the answer is "l" for symbolic links, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
10 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. Is it asking about the priorities within the project, or the priorities for how the project is broken down and delivered? I'll have to review my notes to make sure I understand the MoSCoW concept properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
10 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about quality assurance techniques. I'll review the options carefully and go with the one that best aligns with ensuring the quality of acceptance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
10 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully review the exhibit and options to identify the potential issues with the proposed MCS configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
10 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll just follow the steps in the explanation and update the chart as required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
10 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I remember discussing these credential best practices in class. I feel confident I can get the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel