Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Linux Foundation KCNA Exam - Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Which of the following is an advantage a cloud-native microservices application has over monolithic applications?
C) Cloud-native microservice applications tend to be easier to scale and perform updates on.
A) Cloud-native microservices applications tend to be faster and more responsive than monolithic applications.
B) Cloud-native microservice applications tend to be easier to troubleshoot.

Linux Foundation KCNA Exam - Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Linux Foundation's KCNA exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 2
[All KCNA Questions]

Which of the following is an advantage a cloud-native microservices application has over monolithic applications?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/generated/kubectl/kubectl-commands#scale


by Aimee at Sep 14, 2024, 05:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium KCNA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Xuan
10 months ago
I think it depends on the use case, honestly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
10 months ago
Scaling is a huge advantage for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
10 months ago
Wait, are they really faster? I thought monoliths had better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viki
10 months ago
I agree, troubleshooting is way simpler too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
11 months ago
Definitely easier to scale and update!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
11 months ago
I vaguely recall that microservices can be faster, but I think the scaling aspect is more significant. I hope I remember this correctly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C because scaling and updating sounds like a big deal in cloud-native environments, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
11 months ago
I think I practiced a question like this before, and I feel like troubleshooting was mentioned as a benefit of microservices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
11 months ago
I remember reading that microservices can be more scalable, but I'm not sure if that's the main advantage over monolithic apps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
11 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Aren't cloud-native microservices also supposed to be more responsive and performant? I'm not sure if that's the same as being "faster and more responsive" as option A states. I'll have to double-check my understanding on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key advantage of cloud-native microservices is their modularity and flexibility. That means they're easier to scale and update independently, which is what option C is describing. I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know cloud-native microservices have some advantages, but I'm not entirely sure how they compare to monolithic apps in terms of troubleshooting or scaling. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
12 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the advantages of cloud-native microservices over monolithic applications. I think I have a good understanding of this topic, so I'll try to apply my knowledge to select the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know Google Alerts can be used to monitor brand mentions, but I'm not sure if that's the right tool for measuring the effectiveness of a digital marketing plan. I'll have to think about this one a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
1 year ago
Microservices are like a box of chocolates - you never know what you're gonna get. But at least you can eat just one piece at a time without feeling guilty!
upvoted 0 times
Isaac
1 year ago
C) Cloud-native microservice applications tend to be easier to scale and perform updates on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 year ago
B) Cloud-native microservice applications tend to be easier to troubleshoot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
1 year ago
A) Cloud-native microservices applications tend to be faster and more responsive than monolithic applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myrtie
1 year ago
As a developer, I love the idea of being able to make updates without bringing down the whole system. Microservices are definitely the future, even if they do come with their own set of challenges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
1 year ago
Easier to troubleshoot? That's debatable. When things go wrong in a microservices architecture, it can be a real nightmare tracking down the issue. But I'll take that over the maintenance nightmare of a monolith any day!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
1 year ago
I agree, the scalability and flexibility of microservices is unbeatable. Plus, it's just more fun to work with all these little pieces instead of one big, unwieldy app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
1 year ago
Cloud-native microservices are definitely the way to go. The ability to scale and update individual components is a huge advantage over monolithic apps.
upvoted 0 times
Tawna
1 year ago
C) Cloud-native microservice applications tend to be easier to scale and perform updates on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
1 year ago
A) Cloud-native microservices applications tend to be faster and more responsive than monolithic applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loreta
1 year ago
I believe troubleshooting is easier with cloud-native microservices as well. So, I would go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
1 year ago
I agree with Dierdre. Being able to scale and perform updates easily is also a big advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
I think the advantage is that cloud-native microservices are faster and more responsive.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel