Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 6 Question 66 Discussion

Exhibit.Referring to the exhibit; the 10.0.0.0/24 EBGP route is received on R5; however, the route is being hidden.What are two solutions that will solve this problem? (Choose two.)
B) On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy. and D) On R4, add the external EBGP interface's prefix to the IGP routing tables.
A) On R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to 172.16.1.1 and apply it to IBGP as an export policy.
C) On R4, add the internal IBGP interface prefixes to the BGP routing tables.

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 6 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit.

Referring to the exhibit; the 10.0.0.0/24 EBGP route is received on R5; however, the route is being hidden.

What are two solutions that will solve this problem? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Phillip at Jun 26, 2026, 09:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jamie
3 days ago
Just to clarify, is the route really hidden or just not advertised?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
8 days ago
Option D could also help with visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
13 days ago
Wait, why would you change the next hop to itself? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
18 days ago
Definitely agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
24 days ago
I think option B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
29 days ago
I definitely remember that next hop manipulation is key in BGP, so I think both A and B might be valid solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 month ago
I feel like adding the external EBGP prefix to the IGP routing tables could help, but I’m not entirely confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
1 month ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to adjust the next hop. Option B sounds familiar, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
1 month ago
I remember something about next hop issues in BGP, but I'm not sure if changing it to itself is the right move here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel