Discuss Juniper JN0-664 Exam Topic 6 Question 66

Exhibit.

Referring to the exhibit; the 10.0.0.0/24 EBGP route is received on R5; however, the route is being hidden.

What are two solutions that will solve this problem? (Choose two.)

AOn R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to 172.16.1.1 and apply it to IBGP as an export policy.

BOn R4, create a policy to change the BGP next hop to itself and apply it to IBGP as an export policy.

COn R4, add the internal IBGP interface prefixes to the BGP routing tables.

DOn R4, add the external EBGP interface's prefix to the IGP routing tables.

Suggested Answer: B, D

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

23 comments · newest first

Donte 1 day ago

I agree with B too. It simplifies the route visibility.

Bulah 6 days ago

I think option B makes sense. Changing the next hop to itself could help.

Solange 12 days ago

This question is tricky. I feel unsure about the options.

Jade 17 days ago

A could be useful too, but I’m not sure about the export policy part.

Junita 22 days ago

I feel like B is the best option. It simplifies the routing process.

Dorothy 27 days ago

D is definitely a must. It helps with routing the external prefix.

Glenna 1 month ago

I’m leaning towards A and D. Adjusting the next hop can help visibility.

Karan 1 month ago

I agree, B is solid. Changing the next hop to itself makes sense.

Antione 1 month ago

This question is tricky! I think B and D could work.

Rosio 2 months ago

I thought adding prefixes to the routing tables was a no-go.

Jeniffer 2 months ago

Changing the next hop is definitely a solid fix!

Temeka 2 months ago

Wait, why is the route hidden in the first place?

Shay 2 months ago

I disagree, I think D is more effective.

Farrah 2 months ago

Option B seems like the best choice here.

Jamie 2 months ago

Just to clarify, is the route really hidden or just not advertised?

Raelene 3 months ago

Option D could also help with visibility.

Val 3 months ago

Wait, why would you change the next hop to itself? Seems risky.

Myong 3 months ago

Definitely agree with that!

Johnson 3 months ago

I think option B is the way to go!

Osvaldo 3 months ago

I definitely remember that next hop manipulation is key in BGP, so I think both A and B might be valid solutions.

Salome 3 months ago

I feel like adding the external EBGP prefix to the IGP routing tables could help, but I’m not entirely confident about that.

Marta 4 months ago

I think I practiced a similar question where we had to adjust the next hop. Option B sounds familiar, but I can't recall the details.

Robt 4 months ago

I remember something about next hop issues in BGP, but I'm not sure if changing it to itself is the right move here.

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 6 Question 66 Discussion