Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper Exam JN0-664 Topic 6 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit

You are examining an L3VPN route that includes the information shown in the exhibit

Which statement is correct in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

BGP add-path is a feature that allows the advertisement of multiple paths through the same peering session for the same prefix without the new paths implicitly replacing any previous paths. This behavior promotes path diversity and reduces multi-exit discriminator (MED) oscillations. BGP add-path is implemented by adding a path identifier to each path in the NLRI. The path identifier can be considered as something similar to a route distinguisher in VPNs, except that a path ID can apply to any address family.Path IDs are unique to a peering session and are generated for each network3. In this question, we have a route reflector (RR) that receives two routes for the same prefix (192.168.0.0/16) from an EBGP neighbor. By default, the RR will only advertise its best path to its clients (R1 and R2). However, we want R1 and R2 to receive both routes from the RR. To achieve this, we need to configure BGP add-path on the RR and enable it to send multiple paths for the same prefix to its clients.


by Wynell at Aug 05, 2023, 12:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Gail
2 days ago
Haha, I love how they try to trick us with these questions. Type 2 route distinguisher? Easy peasy lemon squeezy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
5 days ago
Wait, what? Type 2 route distinguisher? Seriously? I thought it was a Type 0 all along. Man, this exam is really testing my networking knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
5 days ago
Hmm, I see your point. Can you explain why you think it's Type 2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
8 days ago
Hmm, I was a bit unsure at first, but after reviewing the exhibit, I think option C is the way to go. Type 2 route distinguishers, here we come!
upvoted 0 times
...
William
9 days ago
The information in the exhibit clearly shows a Type 2 route distinguisher, which is the correct answer according to the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
13 days ago
I disagree, I believe it is C) The information shows a Type 2 route distinguisher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
17 days ago
I think the correct statement is A) The information shows a Type 1 route distinguisher.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel