New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 6 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit

You are examining an L3VPN route that includes the information shown in the exhibit

Which statement is correct in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

BGP add-path is a feature that allows the advertisement of multiple paths through the same peering session for the same prefix without the new paths implicitly replacing any previous paths. This behavior promotes path diversity and reduces multi-exit discriminator (MED) oscillations. BGP add-path is implemented by adding a path identifier to each path in the NLRI. The path identifier can be considered as something similar to a route distinguisher in VPNs, except that a path ID can apply to any address family.Path IDs are unique to a peering session and are generated for each network3. In this question, we have a route reflector (RR) that receives two routes for the same prefix (192.168.0.0/16) from an EBGP neighbor. By default, the RR will only advertise its best path to its clients (R1 and R2). However, we want R1 and R2 to receive both routes from the RR. To achieve this, we need to configure BGP add-path on the RR and enable it to send multiple paths for the same prefix to its clients.


by Wynell at Aug 05, 2023, 12:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Stevie
3 months ago
Type 0? Never heard of that one before!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
3 months ago
I thought route targets were different from route distinguishers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not a Type 2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
4 months ago
I agree, A is the correct choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
4 months ago
That's definitely a Type 1 route distinguisher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
4 months ago
I’m pretty confident that the exhibit shows a route target, but I need to double-check the definitions to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards Type 2 for this one, but I keep mixing up the types. I wish I had reviewed the differences more thoroughly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
5 months ago
This question feels familiar; I practiced one about route distinguishers last week. I think Type 0 is related to something else, but I can't recall exactly what.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
5 months ago
I think I remember that Type 1 route distinguishers are used for VPNv4 routes, but I'm not entirely sure if that's what we're looking at here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leana
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Is the active role determined by the physical address or the transport address? I'll need to double-check the LDP protocol specifications to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think the correct answer is option A: sap 1/1/1:200.100. The top tag of 200 and bottom tag of 100 match what CE-B is expecting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
10 months ago
The exhibit is as clear as mud. I'm just gonna go with my gut and choose option C. If it's wrong, I'll blame the question design!
upvoted 0 times
Emilio
9 months ago
User 3: I agree with Emilio, option D seems like the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
9 months ago
User 2: I'm going with option D, it seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
9 months ago
User 1: I think the exhibit is confusing too. I'll go with option A just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
10 months ago
Haha, I love how they try to trick us with these questions. Type 2 route distinguisher? Easy peasy lemon squeezy!
upvoted 0 times
Geraldine
10 months ago
B) The information shows a Type 0 route distinguisher
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
10 months ago
A) The information shows a Type 1 route distinguisher.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chuck
10 months ago
Wait, what? Type 2 route distinguisher? Seriously? I thought it was a Type 0 all along. Man, this exam is really testing my networking knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
10 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. Can you explain why you think it's Type 2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
11 months ago
Hmm, I was a bit unsure at first, but after reviewing the exhibit, I think option C is the way to go. Type 2 route distinguishers, here we come!
upvoted 0 times
Chau
9 months ago
Type 2 route distinguisher does seem to fit the information provided in the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
9 months ago
I was leaning towards option C as well, the exhibit points towards a Type 2 route distinguisher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
9 months ago
I think you're right, Type 2 route distinguishers make sense based on the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
10 months ago
I agree with you, option C seems to be the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
11 months ago
The information in the exhibit clearly shows a Type 2 route distinguisher, which is the correct answer according to the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is C) The information shows a Type 2 route distinguisher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
11 months ago
I think the correct statement is A) The information shows a Type 1 route distinguisher.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel