Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-664 Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 2
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Brice
20 days ago
You know, this question reminds me of that time I accidentally configured a BGP neighbor on the wrong interface and ended up routing all my traffic through the company cafeteria. Ah, good times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
24 days ago
Wait, hold up, I think you're both wrong. It's gotta be B) multihop. You need that to establish EBGP sessions between non-directly connected routers, don't you?
upvoted 0 times
Bette
3 days ago
I think it's actually C) multipath. That allows for load balancing between multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margarita
1 months ago
That makes sense too. Both options could work in this scenario depending on the specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) add-path as it allows for multiple paths to be advertised to the same neighbor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
1 months ago
I think the answer is C) multipath because it allows for multiple paths to be installed in the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
2 months ago
Nah, I'm pretty sure it's C) multipath. That's the one that lets you load-balance traffic across multiple paths, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Karan
4 days ago
User1: Definitely, let's go with that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
5 days ago
User3: So, we all agree on C) multipath then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
5 days ago
User2: Yeah, that makes sense. It would ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
8 days ago
User1: I think it's C) multipath too. It allows for load-balancing across multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
9 days ago
User1: Definitely, let's go with that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
28 days ago
User3: So, we all agree on C) multipath then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, that makes sense. It would ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
1 months ago
User1: I think it's C) multipath too. It allows for load-balancing across multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Detra
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is A) add-path. That's the BGP feature that allows multiple paths to the same destination to be advertised, right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel