Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper Exam JN0-664 Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 2
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, you are receiving the 192.168 0 0/16 route on both R3 and R4 from your EBGP neighbor You must ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes from the route reflector

In this scenario, which BGP feature should you configure to accomplish this behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

BGP add-path is a feature that allows the advertisement of multiple paths through the same peering session for the same prefix without the new paths implicitly replacing any previous paths. This behavior promotes path diversity and reduces multi-exit discriminator (MED) oscillations. BGP add-path is implemented by adding a path identifier to each path in the NLRI. The path identifier can be considered as something similar to a route distinguisher in VPNs, except that a path ID can apply to any address family.Path IDs are unique to a peering session and are generated for each network3. In this question, we have a route reflector (RR) that receives two routes for the same prefix (192.168.0.0/16) from an EBGP neighbor. By default, the RR will only advertise its best path to its clients (R1 and R2). However, we want R1 and R2 to receive both routes from the RR. To achieve this, we need to configure BGP add-path on the RR and enable it to send multiple paths for the same prefix to its clients.


by Eleonore at Apr 09, 2025, 07:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Brice
2 months ago
You know, this question reminds me of that time I accidentally configured a BGP neighbor on the wrong interface and ended up routing all my traffic through the company cafeteria. Ah, good times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
2 months ago
Wait, hold up, I think you're both wrong. It's gotta be B) multihop. You need that to establish EBGP sessions between non-directly connected routers, don't you?
upvoted 0 times
Pa
20 days ago
B) multihop is used to establish EBGP sessions between non-directly connected routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
21 days ago
C) multipath allows for load balancing across multiple paths for the same prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
23 days ago
A) add-path allows for multiple paths to be advertised for a single prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
1 months ago
I agree with you, it has to be B) multihop. That's necessary for establishing EBGP sessions between routers that are not directly connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
1 months ago
No, I'm pretty sure it's D) route-target. That's used for controlling the distribution of routes within a BGP network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
2 months ago
I think it's actually C) multipath. That allows for load balancing between multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margarita
3 months ago
That makes sense too. Both options could work in this scenario depending on the specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) add-path as it allows for multiple paths to be advertised to the same neighbor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) multipath because it allows for multiple paths to be installed in the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
3 months ago
Nah, I'm pretty sure it's C) multipath. That's the one that lets you load-balance traffic across multiple paths, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Karan
2 months ago
User1: Definitely, let's go with that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
2 months ago
User3: So, we all agree on C) multipath then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
2 months ago
User2: Yeah, that makes sense. It would ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
2 months ago
User1: I think it's C) multipath too. It allows for load-balancing across multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
2 months ago
User1: Definitely, let's go with that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
3 months ago
User3: So, we all agree on C) multipath then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
3 months ago
User2: Yeah, that makes sense. It would ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
3 months ago
User1: I think it's C) multipath too. It allows for load-balancing across multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Detra
3 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is A) add-path. That's the BGP feature that allows multiple paths to the same destination to be advertised, right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel