New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 2
[All JN0-664 Questions]

Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, you are receiving the 192.168 0 0/16 route on both R3 and R4 from your EBGP neighbor You must ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes from the route reflector

In this scenario, which BGP feature should you configure to accomplish this behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

BGP add-path is a feature that allows the advertisement of multiple paths through the same peering session for the same prefix without the new paths implicitly replacing any previous paths. This behavior promotes path diversity and reduces multi-exit discriminator (MED) oscillations. BGP add-path is implemented by adding a path identifier to each path in the NLRI. The path identifier can be considered as something similar to a route distinguisher in VPNs, except that a path ID can apply to any address family.Path IDs are unique to a peering session and are generated for each network3. In this question, we have a route reflector (RR) that receives two routes for the same prefix (192.168.0.0/16) from an EBGP neighbor. By default, the RR will only advertise its best path to its clients (R1 and R2). However, we want R1 and R2 to receive both routes from the RR. To achieve this, we need to configure BGP add-path on the RR and enable it to send multiple paths for the same prefix to its clients.


by Eleonore at Apr 09, 2025, 07:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Devon
2 months ago
Route-target seems irrelevant here, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
2 months ago
Totally agree, add-path is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
3 months ago
Surprised that add-path is the answer, I didn't see that coming!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
3 months ago
I thought multipath would work too, but I guess not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
3 months ago
You need to configure add-path for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
3 months ago
I feel like multihop is more about establishing connections rather than handling route distribution, so I’m leaning towards add-path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
4 months ago
Route-target seems like it could be related, but I don't recall it being used for this specific purpose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question about BGP features, and I think multipath could be relevant here, but it might not be the best fit for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
4 months ago
I think we might need to use add-path to allow R1 and R2 to receive both routes, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
4 months ago
Based on the scenario, I believe the add-path feature is the correct solution. This allows the route reflector to advertise multiple paths to the same destination, which would ensure that R1 and R2 receive both routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The options include add-path, multihop, multipath, and route-target. I'll need to review the details of each feature to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
5 months ago
Okay, let me see... The question is asking about how to ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes from the route reflector. I'm thinking the add-path feature might be the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky BGP question. I'll need to think carefully about the different BGP features and how they could be used to accomplish the desired behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
9 months ago
You know, this question reminds me of that time I accidentally configured a BGP neighbor on the wrong interface and ended up routing all my traffic through the company cafeteria. Ah, good times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
10 months ago
Wait, hold up, I think you're both wrong. It's gotta be B) multihop. You need that to establish EBGP sessions between non-directly connected routers, don't you?
upvoted 0 times
Pa
8 months ago
B) multihop is used to establish EBGP sessions between non-directly connected routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
8 months ago
C) multipath allows for load balancing across multiple paths for the same prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
8 months ago
A) add-path allows for multiple paths to be advertised for a single prefix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
8 months ago
I agree with you, it has to be B) multihop. That's necessary for establishing EBGP sessions between routers that are not directly connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
8 months ago
No, I'm pretty sure it's D) route-target. That's used for controlling the distribution of routes within a BGP network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
9 months ago
I think it's actually C) multipath. That allows for load balancing between multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margarita
10 months ago
That makes sense too. Both options could work in this scenario depending on the specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) add-path as it allows for multiple paths to be advertised to the same neighbor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
10 months ago
I think the answer is C) multipath because it allows for multiple paths to be installed in the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
11 months ago
Nah, I'm pretty sure it's C) multipath. That's the one that lets you load-balance traffic across multiple paths, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Karan
9 months ago
User1: Definitely, let's go with that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
9 months ago
User3: So, we all agree on C) multipath then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
9 months ago
User2: Yeah, that makes sense. It would ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
9 months ago
User1: I think it's C) multipath too. It allows for load-balancing across multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
9 months ago
User1: Definitely, let's go with that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
10 months ago
User3: So, we all agree on C) multipath then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
10 months ago
User2: Yeah, that makes sense. It would ensure that R1 and R2 receive both BGP routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
10 months ago
User1: I think it's C) multipath too. It allows for load-balancing across multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Detra
11 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is A) add-path. That's the BGP feature that allows multiple paths to the same destination to be advertised, right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel