Juniper JN0-664 Exam - Topic 2 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-664 exam

Question #: 30
Topic #: 2

Exhibit

CE-1 and CE-2 are part of a VPLS called Customer1 No connectivity exists between CE-1 and CE-2. In the process of troubleshooting, you notice PE-1 is not learning any routes for this VPLS from PE-2, and PE-2 is not learning any routes for this VPLS from PE-1.

AThe route target must match on PE-1 and PE-2.

BThe route distinguisher must match on PE-1 and PE-2.

CThe instance type should be changed to I2vpn.

DThe no-tunnel-services statement should be deleted on both PEs.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

VPLS is a technology that provides Layer 2 VPN services over an MPLS network. VPLS uses BGP as its control protocol to exchange VPN membership information between PE routers. The route target is a BGP extended community attribute that identifies which VPN a route belongs to. The route target must match on PE routers that participate in the same VPLS instance, otherwise they will not accept or advertise routes for that VPLS.

by Merilyn at Jul 18, 2024, 12:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-664 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ming

3 months ago

Surprised there's no connectivity at all!

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

3 months ago

I’m not sure about C, that seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casie

3 months ago

Wait, could it be B instead?

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

4 months ago

I think it's definitely A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edgar

4 months ago

Route target matching is crucial for VPLS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

4 months ago

I feel like the instance type being set to I2vpn might be relevant, but I don't have a clear example from my studies to back that up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawanna

4 months ago

The no-tunnel-services statement sounds familiar, but I can't remember if it applies to this scenario or not.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

4 months ago

I think I practiced a question where the route distinguisher was the problem, but I can't recall the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isidra

5 months ago

I remember something about route targets needing to match for VPLS to work correctly, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main issue here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. Is it possible the instance type needs to be changed to I2vpn? Or could the no-tunnel-services statement be causing the problem?

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlie

5 months ago

Ah, I got this. The route target must be the issue here. That's the first thing I'd check to make sure it's configured correctly and matching on both PE-1 and PE-2.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. The key seems to be that PE-1 and PE-2 are not learning any routes for this VPLS from each other. I'm thinking the route target or route distinguisher configuration could be the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chauncey

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky VPLS issue. I'll need to carefully review the information provided and think through the possible causes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

5 months ago

Alright, time to put on my troubleshooting hat. I'll start by verifying the route target and route distinguisher configurations on both PE routers. That seems like the most likely culprit based on the information provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hester

5 months ago

I think the answer is material properties. The vibration characteristics and the inherent properties of the components both play a crucial role in vibration-induced fatigue. I'm feeling confident about this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Renea

5 months ago

I remember a practice question similar to this! I think "all of the above" could be a strong answer since they all seem relevant to protecting from liability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosenda

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like it's asking about code quality tools for Java. I think I remember learning about PMD, which can detect issues like unused variables and empty catch blocks. I'll go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...